Closed-Loop Contaminated Soil Treatment With Adaptive Reactor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional soil remediation methods are inefficient and costly due to overestimation of contamination levels, leading to excessive treatment of soil batches, high energy consumption, and incomplete contaminant degradation, particularly in the case of PFAS contamination.

Innovation Solution

A closed-loop soil treatment system with real-time adaptability, utilizing a sensing device, computing device, and reactor to dynamically adjust operational parameters such as milling speed, chemical additive dosage, and dwell time based on continuous soil property measurements, optimizing treatment conditions for varying contamination levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If thermal desorption is used to treat contaminated soil, then contaminant degradation is achieved, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant degradationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from high-temperature thermal desorption to low-temperature mechanochemical treatment. The ball mill reactor operates at ambient or near-ambient temperatures, fundamentally changing the temperature parameter of the treatment process. This enables effective contaminant degradation without the excessive energy consumption associated with heating soil to high temperatures, directly resolving the technical contradiction between degradation effectiveness and energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal field (heat-based treatment) with a mechanical field (ball mill grinding). Instead of using thermal energy to volatilize and degrade contaminants, the system uses mechanical energy from rotating ball bearings to physically break down soil particles and contaminants through grinding and impact forces. This mechanical substitution eliminates the need for high energy input while maintaining effective contaminant degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If static treatment parameters are used for all soil batches, then treatment process simplicity is maintained, but treatment efficiency decreases due to over-treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidtreatment process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making treatment parameters adaptive rather than static. The system continuously monitors contamination levels in real-time and dynamically adjusts operational parameters such as ball mill rotation speed, treatment duration, and chemical additive dosing. This dynamic adjustment enables each soil batch to receive precisely the treatment it needs, maximizing efficiency while avoiding over-treatment, and directly addresses the contradiction between productivity and process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by implementing a closed-loop control system where treatment parameters are continuously adjusted based on real-time monitoring of contamination levels. Sensors measure contaminant concentrations during treatment, and this feedback information is used to modify operational parameters on-the-fly. This ensures optimal treatment efficiency for each batch while maintaining manageable process complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If high chemical additive dosage is applied to ensure complete contaminant degradation, then degradation effectiveness is improved, but resource waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant degradationVSAvoidchemical additive consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing chemical additive dosing based on real-time contamination measurements. Instead of using fixed high dosages, the system adjusts chemical additive concentrations dynamically to match the actual contamination level of each soil batch. This ensures sufficient contaminant degradation while minimizing chemical consumption and waste, directly resolving the contradiction between degradation effectiveness and resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using only the necessary amount of chemical additives required for each specific contamination case. Rather than applying excessive dosages uniformly to all soil batches, the system determines the precise additive quantity needed based on measured contamination levels, achieving complete degradation where necessary while avoiding unnecessary chemical use and waste in lower-contamination batches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances remediation efficiency by minimizing resource waste and energy consumption while ensuring effective contaminant degradation, adapting to batch-specific contamination variability and improving throughput.

Implementation Method 1

a ball mill reactor that includes a rotary shaft and metallic ball bearings, the treatment operation includes stirring the impacted soil with the metallic ball bearings at a rotational speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical grinding: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

the reactor is configured to receive aluminum and magnesium metallic additives for the treatment operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentUS20250281954A1Closed-loop treatment of contaminated soil
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 REMEDY SCIENTIFIC INC
  • US20250281954A1 patent drawing
  • US20250281954A1 patent drawing
  • US20250281954A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for on-site treatment of impacted soil may include a soil-treatment device, a sensing device, and a computing device. The soil-treatment device includes an inlet for receiving impacted soil from a contaminated site and a reactor configured to treat the impacted soil according to one or more operational parameters. The sensing device is configured to receive a sample from the impacted soil and perform, on-site during the treatment process, a measurement of the sample. The computing device includes a memory storing executable instructions and one or more processors. When executed, the instructions cause the processors to receive the measurement from the sensing device, apply a model to determine, during the treatment process and based on the measurement, a value of one of the operational parameters in the set, and output the determined value for the soil-treatment device to perform the treatment operation according to the operational parameters.