Closed Rotatable Extractor System for Solvent Vapor Atmosphere

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current extraction methods for plant materials are inefficient, particularly for small-scale production, as they often require high energy, involve fragile and costly equipment, and pose safety hazards due to the use of steam distillation and water processing, while also being unsuitable for ambient temperature operations and solvent reuse.

Innovation Solution

A closed rotatable extraction system with flexible tubes and valves that maintains a solvent vapor atmosphere, allowing for efficient liquid and vapor transfer without mechanical devices, enabling extraction at near-ambient temperatures and reducing solvent usage and energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If steam distillation is used for extraction, then extraction efficiency is improved, but energy consumption increases and safety hazards occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs phase transitions of solvents between liquid and vapor states to achieve extraction and separation. The system utilizes the solvent's ability to transition phases naturally at near-ambient temperatures, eliminating the need for high-energy steam generation while maintaining effective extraction through controlled vaporization and condensation cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical heating systems (steam generators, heaters) with a passive phase transition-based system. The extraction process relies on the inherent phase change properties of solvents rather than externally applied thermal energy, significantly reducing energy consumption and eliminating safety hazards associated with steam generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If steam distillation and water processing are used, then extraction is achieved, but safety hazards and processing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction capabilityVSAvoidsafety hazards
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a closed system atmosphere consisting primarily of solvent vapor, which is inherently safer and more controlled than steam or air environments. This inert vapor atmosphere eliminates safety hazards associated with high-temperature steam generation and reduces the risk of oxidation or unwanted reactions during the extraction process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a closed, reusable extraction chamber that eliminates the need for disposable or frequently replaced components. The durable closed system design reduces long-term costs and eliminates safety hazards associated with repeated setup and teardown of extraction apparatus

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If conventional extraction devices are used, then extraction is performed, but solvent recovery is difficult and equipment costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction performanceVSAvoidsolvent loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes phase transitions to achieve automatic solvent recovery and reuse. The closed system allows solvent vapor to condense back into liquid form after extraction, enabling complete solvent recovery without loss. This eliminates the need for additional recovery equipment and prevents solvent waste while maintaining extraction performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines extraction, separation, and solvent recovery functions into a single integrated closed system. By merging these previously separate processes into one unified apparatus, the system eliminates solvent loss between stages and reduces equipment complexity while maintaining high extraction performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Speed

If high temperature processing is used, then extraction speed is improved, but natural essence retention deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction speedVSAvoidnatural essence retention
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the temperature parameter to near-ambient conditions while maintaining effective extraction speed through the use of solvent vapor atmosphere and increased surface area contact. This parameter change preserves the natural essence and volatile compounds in the extract that would otherwise be degraded by high-temperature processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Ease of operation

If mechanical devices for transfer, heating, and cooling are used, then process control is improved, but device complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess controlVSAvoidmechanical device requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs self-service mechanisms where the system uses its own components and environmental conditions to perform transfer, heating, and cooling functions without external mechanical devices. The closed system utilizes pressure differentials, phase transitions, and gravity-driven flow to automate these processes, reducing device complexity while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system allows for cost-effective, energy-efficient, and safe extraction of plant materials, retaining the natural essence of the extracts while minimizing solvent usage and equipment costs, and is suitable for small-scale production with various solvent types.

Implementation Method 1

The pressure in the system is less than or about equal to the solvent's vapor pressure at a temperature within the closed rotatable extraction system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 2

vapor passes out of the system through at least one valve in an open state and is connected to the solvent container such that the atmosphere remains the solvent vapor atmosphere during the distillation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Implementation Method 3

The vapor transfer is a distillation from the second tube containing extract solution to another tube within the system or to a solvent container outside of the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Data Source

PatentUS20220233971A1Closed rotatable extractor system
Publication Date: 2022.07.28 BREVETS LLC
  • US20220233971A1 patent drawing
  • US20220233971A1 patent drawing
  • US20220233971A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A closed rotatable extraction system includes at least two tubes where one tube accepts an extractable material, and the system can be evacuated through a valve in the system. At least one conduit comprises at least one flexible hose, bent ridged pipe, t-pipe, curved pipe, or any combination thereof. At least one valve that when open allows evacuation of the system, and optionally for introduction of a solvent for extraction. When the at least one valve is closed a solvent vapor atmosphere is defined as almost exclusively or exclusively the solvent vapor and has a gas pressure that is about the solvents vapor pressure or less in the closed rotatable extraction system. The closed rotatable extraction system or a portion thereof can involve a first rotation orientation for liquid transfer and a second orientation for a vapor transfer.