Closed-System Monitoring via Process and CPU Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems struggle to accurately monitor performance and security in open systems due to their flexibility, making it difficult to identify issues like memory overflow and processing overload, especially with increasing data production and complex machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a computer-implemented method to monitor closed systems by determining process and thread counts within predetermined ranges and CPU usage, issuing alerts for deviations, using AI-based models to detect anomalies and malicious activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If open systems are used to process data, then system flexibility and adaptability are improved, but monitoring precision and security detection capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidmonitoring precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring function by separating security monitoring tasks from general system operations. It creates a dedicated security monitoring system that operates independently within the closed system architecture, allowing precise monitoring of specific security parameters (process counts, CPU usage, memory allocation) without being affected by the flexibility needs of the broader open system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a security monitoring system as an intermediary layer between the open system and the monitoring function. This intermediary operates within the closed system boundaries, collecting security-relevant data from the open system while maintaining the flexibility of the open system architecture. The intermediary filters and analyzes data to provide precise security monitoring without compromising system adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the number of programs and processes increases to handle data production, then processing capability is improved, but system complexity and difficulty of detecting anomalies increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial monitoring by focusing security monitoring resources only on critical parameters (process counts, CPU usage, memory allocation) rather than monitoring every system detail. This selective monitoring approach maintains processing capability by allowing the system to run multiple programs while reducing the complexity burden on the monitoring system itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor security parameters and provide real-time information about system state. The monitoring system collects data on process counts and resource usage, compares it against baseline values, and provides feedback alerts when anomalies are detected. This feedback loop enables the system to maintain high processing capability while managing complexity through automated detection and response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If conventional monitoring products are used in open systems, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability and security detection capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the monitoring parameters from general system metrics to security-specific parameters (process counts, CPU usage, memory allocation). By focusing on these specific parameters, the monitoring system maintains ease of operation through simplified data collection while significantly improving security detection capability and reliability. The parameter change enables the system to operate easily while detecting security anomalies that conventional monitoring products miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250355998A1Monitoring closed systems for security and/or performance issues
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20250355998A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355998A1 patent drawing
  • US20250355998A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method, according to one approach, includes: determining a number of processes and threads for each of a plurality of programs currently running on a closed system. For each of the programs in the plurality of programs, a determination is made as to whether the respective number of processes and threads are in a first predetermined range. Moreover, for each of the programs determined as having a respective number of processes and threads that are in the first predetermined range, CPU usage associated with the respective programs is determined. A security alert is issued in response to determining that at least one of the programs include: a respective number of processes and threads that are outside the first predetermined range, and a combined CPU usage that is outside a second predetermined range.