Closed Venting IV Set with Hydrophobic Membrane for Vapor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current IV administration systems for hazardous drugs pose risks due to exposure to hazardous vapors and drugs during priming, as standard methods do not adequately prevent the infusion of air and vapor, leading to potential health issues for clinicians and patients.

Innovation Solution

A closed venting system is introduced, featuring a coupling assembly, drip chamber with a membrane to prevent air passage, and a self-sealing priming port for safe priming and flushing, which includes a vent membrane at the patient conduit's terminal end to automatically vent hazardous vapors into the fluid reservoir, minimizing exposure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard priming procedures are used to purge air from the patient conduit, then air is effectively removed, but hazardous vapors are displaced and exposed to clinicians

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair purging effectivenessVSAvoidhazardous vapor exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A hydrophobic vent membrane is introduced as an intermediary component at the terminal end of the patient conduit. This membrane allows air vapor to pass through while blocking hazardous liquid drug, serving as a mediator that separates the harmful liquid phase from the breathable vapor phase during priming operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The vent membrane functions as a thin film barrier that selectively permits passage of air vapors while preventing passage of hazardous liquid chemotherapy agents. The membrane's hydrophobic properties enable it to act as a flexible barrier that maintains system pressure while allowing controlled venting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the system remains closed during priming to prevent vapor escape, then vapor exposure is minimized, but air cannot be effectively vented from the patient conduit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazardous vapor containmentVSAvoidair venting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vent membrane utilizes porous material structure with specific pore sizes that allow air molecules to pass through while blocking larger chemotherapy drug molecules. The porous configuration enables selective permeability based on molecular size differences between air and hazardous liquid

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The vent membrane creates an inert barrier that prevents hazardous liquid from escaping into the environment while still allowing air to pass. This inert barrier approach contains the harmful substance without compromising the air venting function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a membrane is added to prevent air passage, then vapor containment is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevapor containment effectivenessVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vent membrane is integrated as a disposable component within the patient conduit assembly. This approach allows use of specialized membrane materials without increasing reusable system complexity, as the membrane is discarded with the single-use conduit after one patient application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents exposure to hazardous vapors and drugs during priming and infusion by ensuring air is vented safely, reducing the risk of adverse reactions and allowing for efficient purging of air and hazardous substances, thereby enhancing safety for both clinicians and patients.

Implementation Method 1

a membrane interposedly positioned between the secondary fluid reservoir and the output of the drip chamber, wherein the membrane prevents passage of air from the drip chamber to the output of the drip chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical barrier:

Implementation Method 2

the priming port having a split septum which forms an airtight seal thereby maintaining pressure within the drip chamber and the remainder of the IV delivery system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAirtight seal:

Implementation Method 3

a vent membrane at the patient conduit's terminal end to automatically vent hazardous vapors into the fluid reservoir

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor passage:

Data Source

PatentEP2566570B1Systems and methods for providing a closed venting hazardous drug iv set
Publication Date: 2015.08.19 BECTON DICKINSON & CO
  • EP2566570B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2566570B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2566570B1 patent drawingFigure 1C

AI summary

A device for priming and venting a hazardous drug within an intravenous administration set (10). The device includes various access ports (42, 26, 86) and fluid channels (50, 150) to permit direct injection of a hazardous drug into the fluid reservoir (24), while eliminating the possibility of undesirable exposure to the hazardous drug. The device further includes priming and flushing ports to enable flushing of a hazardous drug from the system following an infusion procedure.