Closed-Wing Aircraft With Deformable Wing Portions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fixed-wing aircraft designs face challenges in maneuverability, drag reduction, and adaptability during different flight stages due to the reliance on articulated control surfaces.

Innovation Solution

The proposed technology features a fixed-wing aircraft with a closed wing configuration, incorporating a deformable wing portion that elastically deforms in response to an output torque applied by an actuator arrangement. This deformation allows for maneuvering without articulated control surfaces, reducing drag and enabling lift variation at constant speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If articulated control surfaces are used for maneuvering, then control capability is improved, but drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemaneuverabilityVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The wing is designed with deformable portions that can dynamically change their shape and angle of attack during flight. The deformable leading edge portion and deformable camber portion allow the wing to adapt its configuration for different flight phases, eliminating the need for separate articulated control surfaces that would increase drag.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The deformable wing structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides maneuvering control through shape changes, maintains aerodynamic efficiency by reducing drag, and enables adaptation to different flight stages. The same deformable structure that controls angle of attack also optimizes lift-to-drag ratio, combining control and efficiency functions in one system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If rigid wing structure is used, then structural strength is improved, but adaptability to different flight stages deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidadaptability to flight stages
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The wing is divided into distinct structural portions: a rigid wing root section that maintains overall structural strength and attachment to the fuselage, and deformable sections (leading edge portion and camber portion) that can change shape. This segmentation allows the rigid parts to provide strength while the deformable parts provide adaptability for different flight stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wing structure utilizes changes in physical parameters such as flexibility and stiffness in different regions. The deformable portions are designed with specific material properties and structural characteristics that allow controlled shape changes while the rigid portions maintain constant structural parameters, enabling the wing to adapt its geometry for takeoff, steady flight, and landing phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If deformable wing portions are added for maneuvering, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelift variation capabilityVSAvoidwing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deformable leading edge portion and deformable camber portion are integrated into a unified wing structure rather than being separate components. The actuator system is merged with the wing structure itself, where the deformable portions are built-in features of the wing rather than add-on control surfaces. This merging reduces overall system complexity while maintaining adaptability for lift variation and maneuvering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The closed wing design enhances maneuverability and reduces drag, allowing the aircraft to be trimmed and lift to be varied, thus adapting to different flight stages such as takeoff, steady flight, and landing.

Implementation Method 1

The first deformable wing portion is arranged to elastically deform at an application of the first output torque, or first output torsional moment, to the first deformable wing portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The wing is arranged to provide lift in flight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 3

The first actuator arrangement is arranged to supply a first input torque, or first input torsional moment, to the first connector arrangement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque transmission: Torque

Data Source

PatentEP4566939A1Closed-winged aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.06.11 SADAIR SPEAR
  • EP4566939A1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1c
  • EP4566939A1 patent drawingFigure 2a~3b
  • EP4566939A1 patent drawingFigure 4a~5b

AI summary

1. A fixed-wing aircraft (10) that comprises: a fuselage (14), a closed wing (16), a first actuator arrangement (22), and a first connector arrangement (24). The closed wing (16) is coupled to the fuselage (14) and has a wingtip (18) and a first deformable wing portion (20). The first actuator arrangement (22) is arranged to supply a first input torque to the first connector arrangement (24) at an activation of the first actuator arrangement (22), the first connector arrangement (24) is arranged to apply an first output torque to the first deformable wing portion (20) at a supply of the first input torque to the connector arrangement. The first deformable wing portion (20) is arranged to elastically deform at an application of the first output torque to the first deformable wing portion (20). The closed wing (16) forms an outer support (26) at the wingtip (18) arranged to counter the first output torque.