Closetool Cover Hinge Seat With Low-Force Quick Release

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional closestool cover plate quick installation and disassembly mechanisms are complex and laborious, with single-button control systems requiring high force to operate due to multiple springs, and are unreliable when one of the button mechanisms malfunctions.

Innovation Solution

A quick installation hinge seat with two hinge shafts, support seats, and a button switch featuring a lock control rod with locking and unlocking plates, a resilient trigger device, and a spring for self-locking functionality, allowing easy assembly and disassembly with reduced operational force.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single-button control connecting structure with multiple springs is used, then the button can be operated conveniently, but it requires high force to press the button due to the elasticity of multiple springs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebutton operation convenienceVSAvoidforce required to press button
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the button control system into two independent button mechanisms instead of using a single button. Each button mechanism has its own spring, so when one button is pressed, only one spring's elastic force needs to be overcome, reducing the required pressing force while maintaining operational convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses two buttons instead of one, where each button performs the same function partially. This redundancy allows the system to maintain functionality even if one button mechanism malfunctions, while each individual button requires less force to operate since it only needs to overcome one spring's elasticity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Ease of operation

If a single-button control system with multiple springs is used, then the button can be operated conveniently, but the system complexity increases due to multiple springs and components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebutton operation convenienceVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the control system into two independent, identical button mechanisms. Each mechanism is simpler with only one spring, making them easier to manufacture and maintain. The overall system complexity is managed through modular repetition rather than complex integration of multiple springs in a single mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the structural parameter from a single complex button mechanism with multiple springs to two simpler button mechanisms with single springs each. This parameter change simplifies the individual components while achieving the same functional outcome through redundancy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single-button control system is used, then the structure can be compact, but the reliability decreases when one of the button mechanisms malfunctions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanism structureVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by creating two identical button mechanisms with the same functional properties. Each mechanism is designed to be independently reliable, and the redundancy ensures that the overall system reliability is maintained even if one local mechanism fails

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention provides beforehand cushioning by having a redundant button mechanism ready in advance. If one button mechanism malfunctions, the other is already in place to take over the function, ensuring continuous operational reliability without requiring any corrective action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution simplifies the assembly and disassembly process, reduces the force required to operate the button, and enhances reliability by using a single spring for return and self-locking mechanisms, ensuring the cover plate can be quickly mounted and dismounted with ease.

Implementation Method 1

a spring for pushing the lock control rod and the button outward

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9351614B2Quick installation hinge seat of closetool cover plate
Publication Date: 2016.05.31 HOTI XIAMEN PLUMBING ING
  • US9351614B2 patent drawing
  • US9351614B2 patent drawing
  • US9351614B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A quick installation hinge seat of a closestool cover plate includes two hinge shafts and two support seats. Each hinge shaft has a pin hole for connection of a pin provided on each support seat. A button switch is mounted between the two hinge shafts to control the pin in the pin hole. The button switch includes a hinge pipe, a button seat, a lock control rod slidable in the radial direction of the hinge pipe, a spring, and a button to press the lock control rod. Two ends of the lock control rod are axially inserted in the two hinge shafts respectively and slideable radially. Each of the two ends of the lock control rod has a locking plate and an unlocking plate. The locking plate and the unlocking plate are arranged in a stagger manner. Each pin has a locking groove and an unlocking groove thereon.