E-commerce Closure with Barb Flap Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Leakage of consumer goods during shipping, particularly individual bottles in e-commerce, is a significant issue due to the lack of effective closure mechanisms that prevent accidental opening under shipping and handling stresses.

Innovation Solution

A closure system featuring a cap base with a depending plug and barb flaps that require extra force to open, combined with a locking mechanism, ensures the cap remains closed during transport and only opens with deliberate action by the consumer, utilizing living hinges and a snap-lock design to enhance security against leakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a simple hinged cap closure is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to accidental opening during shipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of openingVSAvoidresistance to accidental opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The closure is divided into functional segments: a hinged cap for opening/closing action, and a separate latching mechanism with barb flaps and recesses for security. This segmentation allows the cap to provide easy operation while the latching mechanism independently provides shipping security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The latching mechanism is pre-configured with barb flaps positioned to engage with recesses in the cap base before shipping occurs. This preliminary engagement prevents accidental opening during transport without interfering with the consumer's ability to open the cap when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a secure latching mechanism is added to prevent leakage, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of leakageVSAvoidclosure structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching mechanism is merged with the existing hinged cap structure. The barb flaps are integrated into the cap body, and the recesses are formed in the cap base, combining the sealing and latching functions into a unified closure system rather than adding separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The latching mechanism is designed to be self-actuating. When the cap is closed, the barb flaps automatically engage with the recesses through the hinge motion, and when the cap is opened, they automatically disengage. No additional actuators or complex mechanisms are required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the cap requires extra force to open during shipping, then resistance to accidental opening is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccidental opening preventionVSAvoidforce required to open
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The latching mechanism provides dynamic resistance: it offers high force resistance during normal shipping conditions when the cap is accidentally subjected to external forces, but allows easy opening when the consumer applies deliberate force in the correct direction to disengage the barb flaps from the recesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The closure effectively prevents liquid egress during shipping and handling, ensuring product integrity by requiring additional force to open, thus minimizing accidental openings and leakage risks, while allowing easy opening by the consumer with minimal effort.

Implementation Method 1

the barbs are pushed up against the wall of the plug and are received within a recess in the cylindrical opening wall. The bar flaps abut an upper wall of the recess such that extra force is required to open the cap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The cap is preferably attached to the cap base using a living hinge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlexural deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

a locking flap on the cap which snaps into and is received within a recess on the cap base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic potential energy: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3921245B1Plug closure
Publication Date: 2022.09.21 UNILEVER GLOBAL IP LTD
  • EP3921245B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3921245B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3921245B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A closure (10), especially useful for e-commerce. The closure comprises a lid (16) and a cap base (12) which can be releasably fastened to a container, the cap base including an opening (24). The lid has a depending plug (26) extending therefrom which is received within the opening in the cap base when the lid is in the closed position. The opening is formed within a cylindrical opening wall (88). When the lid is in its open position, extending outwardly from the depending plug at its end distal from the lid are one or more barb flaps (82). As the lid is moved to its closed position with the depending plug within the cylindrical opening wall, the barbs are pushed up against the walls of the plug and are received within a recess in the cylindric opening wall. Within the recess, the bar flaps abut an upper wall of the recess (40) such that extra force is required to open the lid, e.g., during shipping. When the consumer wishes to open the lid, he or she exerts the extra force needed to force the lid open, which causes the barb flaps to assume their original positions extending outwardly from the cylindrical plug.