Closure Body Spout Orientation Control for Vented Dispensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container closure assemblies with venting features face challenges in achieving optimal dispensing flow rates due to overlapping or contact between venting ears when the spout is extended, leading to reduced flow efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a memory band feature in the spout design, which allows the spout to be deflected and retained in a desired orientation, and utilizing a higher number of narrower venting ears without overlap, ensuring smooth and efficient dispensing by controlling the orientation of venting ears for improved flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single memory band is located adjacent the raised outlet opening, then the spout can be deflected and retained in a desired orientation, but the venting ears overlap or contact when the spout is extended, reducing flow efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespout orientation controlVSAvoiddispensing flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The single memory band is divided into multiple separate memory bands positioned at different locations around the spout. This segmentation allows each memory band to control the orientation of adjacent venting ears independently, preventing overlap and contact between venting ears while maintaining spout deflection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sections of the spout are given different properties through the strategic placement of multiple memory bands at specific locations. Each memory band provides localized orientation control for its adjacent venting ears, creating non-uniform but optimized flow characteristics throughout the spout structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If fewer wider venting ears are used, then the structure is simpler, but the cross-sectional area of the flow opening is reduced, leading to slower dispensing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventing ear structureVSAvoiddispensing flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The venting structure is segmented into multiple narrower venting ears instead of fewer wider ones. This increases the total number of venting openings while maintaining structural simplicity through the use of multiple memory bands that control each ear's orientation independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The solution transitions from considering only the width of individual venting ears to optimizing the overall cross-sectional area by arranging multiple narrower ears in a circular pattern. The cumulative effect of multiple narrow ears equals or exceeds the flow area of fewer wide ears, adding a dimensional arrangement aspect to the design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If the venting ears are made wider, then fewer ears are needed, but adjacent ears overlap or contact when the spout is extended, reducing flow efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of venting earsVSAvoiddispensing flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using fewer wider venting ears that would overlap, the design segments the venting function into multiple narrower ears. The multiple memory bands ensure each ear maintains proper spacing and orientation, preventing contact while collectively providing sufficient venting area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The dimensions of individual venting ears are changed from wide to narrow, while the number of ears is increased. This parameter change, combined with the orientation control from multiple memory bands, eliminates the overlap problem while maintaining or improving total venting capacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances dispensing flow rates by maintaining a selected orientation for directional discharge, reducing venting ear contact, and increasing the cross-sectional area of the flow opening, resulting in smoother and faster dispensing of container contents.

Implementation Method 1

a memory band portion (122) of the frustoconical section (54) adjacent the venting ears (57)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP2248732B1Closure body
Publication Date: 2012.02.08 RIEKE
  • EP2248732B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2248732B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP2248732B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A vented closure assembly (120) for a container, the container including a raised outlet defining a dispensing opening, includes a closure body (22) having a nestable and extendable spout (31) formed with a generally cylindrical section (53), a frustoconical section (54), and a transition region (38), including an invertible fold (48), located between these two sections. The generally cylindrical section defines an outlet opening and a threaded closing cap (23) is assembled to the generally cylindrical section for closing off the outlet opening. A retainer (24) is used for connecting the closure body to the raised outlet wall and the spout includes a thicker wall portion (222, 322) for enabling the generally cylindrical section to maintain a selected orientation. A plurality of venting ears (57) are used to help provide the venting capability.