Motor Vehicle Closure Control Using Operator Orientation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling motorized closure elements in vehicles face challenges in maintaining high detection reliability with minimal effort, especially when operator motions are not pronounced or when no motion is intended to trigger the closure.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating the orientation of the operator's body parts into the monitoring system to determine if the body is facing the closure element, using sensors to detect alignment within a permitted range, thereby preventing unintended activation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If sensor-based detection methods are used to automatically trigger locking element assembly, then ease of operation is improved, but false triggering occurs when operator movements are not pronounced or unintended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic activation convenienceVSAvoiddetection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from detecting only positional information (2D coordinates) to detecting orientation information (angular position around vertical axis), adding a dimensional aspect to the detection parameters. This allows the system to distinguish between intentional activation gestures and incidental body movements by evaluating the operator's facing direction relative to the locking element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the operator's orientation and uses this feedback to modulate the activation behavior. When the operator is facing away from the locking element, the system suppresses activation even if other triggering conditions are met, creating a feedback loop that improves detection reliability while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If multiple body part movements are monitored to increase detection reliability, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses on a single critical parameter (orientation around vertical axis) from the complex set of possible body movement parameters. Instead of analyzing multiple body parts and movement types simultaneously, the system isolates the orientation parameter, which provides sufficient discrimination power to prevent false triggering while keeping the sensor arrangement relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameter from positional coordinates to angular orientation. This parameter transformation allows a single sensor arrangement to achieve high detection reliability by measuring the angle around the vertical axis, avoiding the need for multiple sensors to track different body parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3540164B1Method for controlling a motorised closure element of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.02.23 BROSE FAHRZEUGTEILE GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3540164B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3540164B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for controlling a motorized locking element arrangement of a motor vehicle, wherein the locking element arrangement comprises a locking element, a control arrangement and a sensor arrangement, wherein the sensor measurement values ​​of the sensor arrangement are monitored by means of the control arrangement to determine whether a triggering operating situation, defined by at least one operating situation condition, exists, and wherein, upon detection of the triggering operating situation by means of the control arrangement, a control of the locking element arrangement is triggered.It is proposed that an operating situation condition of the triggering operating situation is defined by the fact that the orientation of at least one body part of the operator around the vertical lies within a predetermined permissible orientation range, that the sensor arrangement detects whether the orientation of at least one body part of the operator around the vertical lies within the permissible orientation range, and that the control of the locking element arrangement is triggered depending on this.