Closure-Friendly SQL Query Operators for Traceability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing SQL query processors in relational databases use universal parameterized functions that are context-independent, leading to inefficient traceability and lack of type safety, and do not conform to the formal closure property, making formal verification of SQL queries difficult.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that dynamically generates closure-friendly operators for each operator and operand in an SQL query, allowing for execution based on a sequence of operations, and analyzes the query using partitions to classify impact on the database schema, enabling tracing and debugging.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If universal parameterized functions are used to process SQL queries, then the query processor can handle any set of input parameters, but traceability and type safety are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput parameter compatibilityVSAvoidtraceability and type safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the universal parameterized function into multiple closure-friendly operators, each corresponding to a specific SQL clause (FROM, WHERE, GROUP BY, SELECT). Each operator is type-checked and maintains closure properties, ensuring traceability while preserving the ability to handle various input parameters through structured composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making each operator context-specific with tailored type checking and closure properties rather than using a single universal function. Each operator is designed with specific input/output types and semantic meaning appropriate to its SQL clause, improving both traceability and type safety while maintaining versatility through composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If a single universal parameterized function is used for each SQL operator, then implementation is simplified, but formal verification becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation complexityVSAvoidformal verifiability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the monolithic universal parameterized function into smaller, discrete closure-friendly operators. Each operator has a well-defined interface, type signature, and closure property that can be independently verified. This segmentation maintains implementation simplicity through modular design while enabling formal verification of each component's correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic operator generation that adapts to the specific SQL query context. Operators are generated dynamically based on the query structure, maintaining flexibility and simplicity in handling diverse queries while ensuring each generated operator satisfies formal verification requirements through type checking and closure properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If context-independent universal functions are used, then operator generality is improved, but debugging and tracing become inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator generalityVSAvoiddebugging and tracing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the query processing into distinct closure-friendly operators that maintain context information. Each operator is associated with its SQL clause and maintains type information, enabling efficient tracing and debugging by tracking the transformation of data through each operator in the query execution plan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where each closure-friendly operator provides information about its input and output types, as well as its semantic meaning. This feedback enables the query processor to trace the execution flow, identify issues during debugging, and maintain context information throughout the query processing pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8650183B2System and method for processing an SQL query made against a relational database
Publication Date: 2014.02.11 WIPRO LTD
  • US8650183B2 patent drawing
  • US8650183B2 patent drawing
  • US8650183B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for processing an SQL query made against a relational database is disclosed. In one example embodiment, the method includes receiving the SQL query made against the relational database. Further, the received SQL query is parsed to obtain each operator and associated one or more operands and sequence of execution of the operators. Furthermore, a closure-friendly operator is dynamically generated for each operator and the associated one or more operands in the received SQL query. In addition, the dynamically generated closure-friendly operators are executed based on the obtained sequence of execution of the operators.