Tamper-Evident Closure With Interleaved Retaining Fingers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container closure technologies lack an effective tamper-evident mechanism that is both secure and visually verifiable, which is crucial for ensuring product integrity and consumer safety.

Innovation Solution

A closure structure featuring a ring with inwardly projecting fingers that engage a container rim's bead, providing a tamper-evident assembly where the engagement is visible and the fingers are removable upon frangible disconnection, enhancing security and visibility of tampering attempts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a closure structure with tamper-evident mechanism is implemented, then product integrity and consumer safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct integrityVSAvoidclosure structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure is divided into distinct functional segments: a body portion for covering the discharge, projecting portions for engagement with the container rim, a separate ring component, and retaining fingers. This segmentation allows each element to perform its specific function while maintaining overall structural integrity and tamper-evident capabilities without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining fingers are positioned within the spacing between adjacent projecting portions, creating a nested arrangement where smaller elements (fingers) are contained within the structural framework of larger elements (projecting portions). This nesting optimizes space utilization and reduces overall device complexity while maintaining tamper-evident functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If retaining fingers are added to engage the bead for secure engagement, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure engagementVSAvoidclosure structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining fingers are integrated with the ring structure, forming a unified component assembly. This merging of functions (retention and structural support) into a single integrated element achieves secure engagement with the container bead while avoiding the complexity of separate independent retention mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining fingers are positioned at specific locations around the closure perimeter where engagement with the container bead is most effective. This localized placement of retention features provides secure engagement only where needed, rather than requiring complex engagement structures throughout the entire closure assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If the engagement of fingers with the bead is made visible through spacing, then measurement precision of tamper evidence is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper evidence visibilityVSAvoidclosure structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spacing between projecting portions acts as an intermediary that allows visual inspection of the engagement status. This natural gap in the structure serves as a viewing window without requiring additional transparent windows, indicators, or complex detection mechanisms, thereby achieving tamper evidence visibility while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If the ring and fingers are removed upon frangible disconnection, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremoval easeVSAvoidtamper evidence integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The frangible connection is pre-designed to disconnect at a specific weak point, enabling easy removal of the ring and fingers without requiring complex tools or procedures. This preliminary design of a predetermined failure point simplifies the removal operation while the fact that disconnection requires deliberate action maintains tamper evidence integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2969817B1Closure for container
Publication Date: 2017.04.26 SONOCO DEVELOPMENT INC
  • EP2969817B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2969817B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2969817B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A closure (14) for covering an opening in a container (12) and engaging a peripheral rim (18) defining the opening. The closure (14) includes a body (24) for covering the container opening and a plurality of projecting portions (30) that extend from a periphery of the body (24). The projecting portions (30) are spaced from one another around the periphery of the body (24), with each formed to surround a portion of the container rim (18). A ring (28) is connected to the projecting portions (30) and surrounds the container rim (18). A plurality of retaining fingers (34) are provided, with each finger spaced from one another and interleaved within the spacing between adjacent projecting portions (30). The fingers (34) project inwardly from the ring and include a projected end for engagement with the container rim. The projected ends of the fingers include a varied or undulating surface.