Closure Security System Tamper Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional container security systems are vulnerable to tampering, as seals can be easily broken, replaced, or duplicated, making it difficult to detect unauthorized access or product contamination during shipment and storage.

Innovation Solution

A closure security system that includes a closure chassis with sensors and a processing system to detect tamper events, generating notifications through communication interfaces, and a container module for tracking and verifying the integrity of the closure and container systems using NFC, Bluetooth, and other communication protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional seals are used for container security, then the system is simple and easy to manufacture, but the reliability of detecting tampering is insufficient because seals can be broken, replaced, or duplicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper detection reliabilityVSAvoidclosure system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system is divided into distinct functional components: a closure chassis containing sensor subsystems and processing systems, a separate seal element, and a container chassis. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function while maintaining overall system reliability for tamper detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Sensor subsystems are pre-configured in the closure chassis to detect tamper events before they occur. The system proactively monitors for unauthorized access attempts, seal removal, or closure manipulation, and generates notifications in advance of actual product compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If sensor subsystems and processing systems are integrated into the closure chassis, then tamper detection capability is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetamper event detectionVSAvoidclosure system manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The closure chassis is designed as a multi-functional integrated unit that combines sealing, sensing, processing, and communication functions. This universal design consolidates multiple subsystems into a single manufacturable component, reducing overall assembly complexity despite the advanced capabilities provided.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The closure chassis serves as an intermediary platform that houses sensor subsystems and processing systems, mediating between the physical seal and the digital notification system. This intermediary structure simplifies manufacturing by providing a standardized platform for integrating electronic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If real-time notification systems are implemented, then product integrity monitoring is improved, but energy consumption and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct integrity informationVSAvoidclosure system energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor subsystems continuously monitor for tamper events, but the notification system operates periodically or event-driven rather than continuously transmitting data. Notifications are generated and transmitted only when tamper events are detected, reducing energy consumption while maintaining real-time product integrity monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The closure system autonomously detects tamper events and generates notifications without requiring continuous external monitoring or power input. The integrated processing system automatically evaluates sensor data and triggers notifications, enabling the system to serve itself with minimal external intervention and reduced energy demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3758397B1Container security system
Publication Date: 2022.04.06 IN TECH ENTERPRISE LTD
  • EP3758397B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3758397B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3758397B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A container network includes a first container system that includes a first container first type communication interface, and a second container system that includes a second container first type communication interface. The second container system communicatively couples to the first container first type communication interface via the second container first type communication interface to form a first container-to-container connection. The second container system performs an exchange of election information of the first container system and second container system with the first container system via the first container-to-container connection, and elects, based on the election information, a second container second type communication interface included on the second container system to provide container network communications to a wide area network. The second container system then provides the container network communications via the second container second type communication interface to the wide area network.