Cloud Software Configuration Compliance Remediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cloud computing environments, it is challenging to ensure software instances comply with configuration policies due to the difficulty in automating the maintenance of configuration files, leading to compliance errors that are hard to identify and remediate efficiently.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that store configuration policies in a compliance repository, receive trigger data indicating compliance errors, compare them with stored policies, and either apply a matching policy or generate a new one to remediate the errors by updating the associated software configuration files.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual maintenance of configuration files is used to ensure compliance, then compliance accuracy can be maintained, but productivity decreases and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance accuracyVSAvoidcompliance maintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the compliance management system automatically detects configuration drift, identifies non-compliant instances, and applies remediation actions without human intervention. The system serves itself by maintaining compliance through automated policies that continuously monitor and correct configuration states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining compliance policies and remediation rules before compliance violations occur. Configuration baselines are established in advance, and automated remediation actions are prepared and applied as soon as drift is detected, preventing compliance violations rather than correcting them afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If automated compliance monitoring is implemented, then productivity improves and time consumption decreases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance maintenance efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance management system performs multiple functions through a single integrated platform: it monitors configuration states, detects compliance violations, identifies affected instances, selects appropriate remediation actions, and applies corrections. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems for each compliance task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary compliance management layer between the infrastructure resources and the compliance requirements. This intermediary automatically translates compliance policies into actionable remediation steps and coordinates the enforcement across multiple software instances, simplifying the overall system architecture while enabling comprehensive compliance monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If comprehensive compliance policies are enforced across all software instances, then reliability improves, but loss of time increases due to extensive validation and processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance assuranceVSAvoidcompliance validation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring compliance enforcement to specific software instances based on their type, criticality, and configuration characteristics. Rather than applying uniform compliance rules to all instances, the system selectively enforces relevant policies on each instance, reducing unnecessary validation time while maintaining compliance assurance where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips redundant validation steps by leveraging previously established compliance baselines and cached configuration states. When configurations have not changed, the system skips re-validation and directly compares current states against stored baselines, significantly reducing validation time while maintaining comprehensive compliance coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS11960880B2Systems and methods for remediation of software configuration
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US11960880B2 patent drawing
  • US11960880B2 patent drawing
  • US11960880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for remediation of software configurations are disclosed. The system may store a plurality of configuration policies in a compliance repository. The system may receive trigger data including at least one compliance error and indicating a software instance operating on a cloud service is out of compliance. The system may compare the at least one compliance error with the plurality of configuration policies. When at least one compliance error matches at least one configuration policy, the system may identify a software configuration file and apply the matching configuration policy to the software configuration file to remediate the software instance. When the at least one compliance error does not match at least one configuration policy, the system may generate a new configuration policy, validate the new configuration policy, and apply the new configuration policy to the software configuration file to remediate the software instance.