Cloud Cost Optimization Leveraging Segmentation and Local Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cloud cost optimization models lack visibility into resource utilization and fail to consider business criticality, environment type, and usage patterns, often relying solely on right sizing and reservations as optimization levers.

Innovation Solution

A processor-implemented method and system that analyzes cloud resource information to identify resource type, environment, and usage patterns, employing a predefined library of optimization models to determine and validate applicable cost optimization patterns, forecasting utilization costs to recommend optimal target states for maximum cost savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If existing models consider only right sizing and reservations as cost optimization levers, then the optimization process is simple, but the cost savings are limited and not comprehensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecloud spendVSAvoidoptimization levers
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments cost optimization into multiple independent levers: right-sizing, reservations, pricing models, performance tiers, and on-demand scaling. Each lever is evaluated separately based on resource characteristics, allowing comprehensive optimization beyond just right-sizing and reservations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization system applies multiple optimization levers universally across different cloud resource types and scenarios. The same framework can recommend right-sizing for underutilized resources, reservations for predictable workloads, or alternative pricing models, making the system versatile and adaptable to various situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If business criticality, environment type, and usage patterns are not considered, then the optimization model is simple, but the relevance and effectiveness of cost optimization options are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization model complexityVSAvoidoptimization recommendation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring optimization recommendations to specific local conditions of each cloud resource. Business criticality, environment type (production, acceptance, test, development), and usage patterns (Business Hours, Weekdays, Always on) are analyzed to provide customized optimization levers appropriate for each resource's context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts optimization recommendations based on changing resource characteristics. By continuously analyzing usage patterns and business criticality, the system adapts its recommendations to reflect current resource states and organizational priorities, making the optimization process responsive and accurate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive analysis of cloud resource information is performed, then cost optimization accuracy is improved, but the processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost optimization accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-defining optimization models and levers in a structured framework. The system pre-analyzes resource characteristics against predefined optimization patterns, allowing comprehensive evaluation without requiring complex real-time processing. This preparation reduces system complexity while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization framework acts as an intermediary layer between raw cloud resource data and actionable recommendations. It mediates the complex analysis by structuring data through predefined models and levers, simplifying the processing pipeline while enabling comprehensive analysis of multiple optimization factors simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230385123A1System and method for recommending cost optimization options for a cloud resource
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • US20230385123A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385123A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385123A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments herein provide a method and system for recommending cost optimization options for a cloud resource. The system and method employ a predefined library of optimization models to determine a best cost optimization options for a cloud resource. The one or more cloud optimization models will be available for different cloud resource type. Each cloud optimization model includes one or more cost optimization levers that can be applied to a cloud resource type. Each of the cost optimization lever includes one or more criteria to check for a condition based on the inputs provided. This criteria will generally be different for business critical and non-mission critical applications. Usage patterns, where each usage pattern is a combination of one or more optimization levers that can be applied together, including the sequence in which to apply. Herein, each criteria to shortlist the best cost saving options.