Automating Digital Forensic Evidence Collection in Cloud Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing adoption of cloud services among individuals and companies complicates digital forensic investigations, particularly for cybercrimes like child exploitation, drug trafficking, and firearms trading, due to the complexity of cloud virtualization environments, making it difficult to collect and analyze digital evidence effectively.

Innovation Solution

A backend system utilizing a convolutional neural network (CNN) and support vector machine (SVM) to process images from client devices, determining feature vectors, and classifying images to identify illicit activities, thereby automating the collection and storage of digital forensic evidence for law enforcement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual digital forensic evidence collection is used in cloud environments, then investigators can thoroughly analyze evidence, but the process is time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence analysis accuracyVSAvoidevidence collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated classification of digital evidence using machine learning models before human investigators review it. Image recognition algorithms pre-process and categorize evidence items, preparing them for subsequent detailed analysis by investigators, thus reducing the time required for initial evidence triage while maintaining analysis quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated evidence management system acts as an intermediary between evidence collection and human analysis. The system includes automated classification modules, metadata extraction tools, and case management software that bridge the gap between raw evidence and investigator review, streamlining the workflow without replacing thorough human analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If all digital evidence is stored in cloud environments, then evidence accessibility is improved, but the complexity of virtualization environments makes evidence tracing difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence accessibilityVSAvoidcloud virtualization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments cloud-based evidence into discrete, manageable units with unique identifiers and metadata tags. Each evidence item is broken down into structured data elements that can be independently tracked and analyzed, reducing the complexity of navigating virtualized cloud environments while maintaining accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An automated evidence management platform serves as an intermediary layer between investigators and cloud-based evidence. The system provides unified access points, automated metadata extraction, and centralized case management interfaces that simplify interaction with complex cloud virtualization environments while preserving evidence accessibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated image classification is implemented, then evidence processing speed increases, but false positives may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevidence processing speedVSAvoidclassification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated image classification as a preliminary filtering step, using machine learning models to quickly identify and prioritize potentially relevant evidence. Classification results serve as initial indicators that guide subsequent detailed human review, enabling fast processing of large evidence volumes while maintaining reliability through layered verification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where classification results are continuously refined based on investigator corrections and outcome data. Machine learning models learn from false positives and negatives, adjusting classification thresholds and parameters over time to improve accuracy while maintaining high processing speeds through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11736532B2Automating digital forensic evidence collection
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 PURDUE RES FOUND
  • US11736532B2 patent drawing
  • US11736532B2 patent drawing
  • US11736532B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for automatic collection and analysis of digital forensic evidence by a cloud service provider is disclosed. The system utilizes machine learning models to identify and store digital forensic evidence relating to cybercrimes committed using a cloud service. Particularly, if an image or video file uploaded to the cloud service provider is determined to relate to illicit, illegal, or malicious activity, relevant digital forensic evidence is extracted and stored for later provision to law enforcement. The digital forensic evidence that is collected may be used to assist law enforcement in their investigations of criminal activity, as well as aid in the successful prosecution of criminals in court proceedings.