Cloud-Based Hardware Scoring Using Terminal Type and Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hardware evaluation software provides inaccurate scores due to lack of consideration for computer type and hardware compatibility, and outdated databases.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that scores hardware components based on the type of computer terminal and uses a cloud server to detect, determine, and update hardware information, incorporating compatibility, functional, and suitability parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If hardware evaluation software merely provides scores based on hardware configuration and adds all scores to derive a total score, then the scoring process is simple, but the accuracy of the total score deteriorates because it does not take into account the types of computers or the compatibility among hardware components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of hardware scoringVSAvoidcomplexity of scoring process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the hardware evaluation process into multiple independent modules: hardware information detection module, computer type determination module, compatibility analysis module, and scoring module. Each module handles a specific aspect of the evaluation, allowing complex compatibility and type-based scoring without overwhelming system complexity. The segmentation enables accurate scoring by breaking down the complex evaluation into manageable parts that can be processed independently and then integrated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multiple parameters beyond basic hardware specifications, including computer type parameters (office, entertainment, business, gaming), compatibility parameters between hardware components, and weighted scoring parameters. These parameter changes enable the system to accurately reflect real-world hardware performance by considering how different computer types utilize hardware differently and how component compatibility affects overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If hardware evaluation software is not updated timely, then the software structure remains stable, but the accuracy of scores deteriorates due to outdated database

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of hardware scoresVSAvoidtime for database updates
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the cloud server continuously receives hardware information from multiple sources, updates the hardware database with latest specifications and compatibility data, and pushes updated evaluation criteria to client devices. This feedback loop ensures the database remains current without requiring manual intervention, maintaining scoring accuracy while minimizing update time through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cloud server performs multiple functions: storing hardware databases, analyzing compatibility information, determining computer types, calculating scores, and distributing updated evaluation criteria to clients. This multi-functionality consolidates update operations into a single centralized system, reducing the overall time required for database maintenance while ensuring all clients receive timely updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If the software considers computer type and hardware compatibility, then the accuracy of hardware scoring is improved, but the complexity of the evaluation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of hardware evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a cloud server as an intermediary between the client hardware evaluation software and the comprehensive hardware database. The cloud server handles the complex tasks of storing detailed hardware specifications, analyzing compatibility relationships, determining computer types, and calculating weighted scores. This intermediary approach allows the client software to remain relatively simple while still benefiting from sophisticated evaluation algorithms, as the heavy computational burden is offloaded to the cloud server.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10129113B2Method and apparatus for evaluating hardware based on cloud server
Publication Date: 2018.11.13 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US10129113B2 patent drawing
  • US10129113B2 patent drawing
  • US10129113B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for evaluating hardware based on a cloud server, the method comprising: detecting information on hardware components of a computer terminal; determining the type of the computer terminal based on information on the hardware components of the computer terminal; and scoring the hardware components of the computer terminal based on information on the hardware components and the type of the computer terminal. In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, the hardware components are scored based on the type of the computer terminal, and the relevant database are timely updated to ensure the accuracy of the hardware scoring.