Cloud Log Security Summarization Using RAG and Event Condensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) fail to effectively summarize cloud log data for security-audit purposes due to lack of specific training, superficial pattern recognition, and inability to distinguish relevant from irrelevant information, often omitting critical events.

Innovation Solution

An agent-based approach using ML models for preprocessing cloud log data, condensing critical information, and employing Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to generate human-readable summaries that prioritize security insights, preserving relevant events.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If general-purpose LLMs are used to summarize cloud log data, then the system can process large volumes of data, but the summaries lack accuracy and omit critical security events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume of cloud log data processedVSAvoidaccuracy of security event detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the summarization process into multiple specialized stages: data ingestion, event extraction, pattern recognition, summary generation, and validation. Each stage is handled by a dedicated component optimized for its specific function, allowing accurate security event detection while processing large volumes of cloud log data without compromising precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation layer that cross-references generated summaries against the original cloud log data and security guidelines. This intermediary mechanism ensures accuracy by detecting and correcting omissions or misinterpretations before final output, resolving the contradiction between processing volume and detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If cloud system administrators analyze all user activity data manually, then they can identify security patterns, but the volume and fragmentation of data makes it overwhelming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity pattern identificationVSAvoiddata volume and fragmentation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates only the critical security-relevant events from the vast cloud log data using pattern recognition algorithms. By taking out only the necessary information (authentication events, privilege changes, access denials) while filtering out redundant data, the system reduces data complexity while maintaining reliable security pattern identification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges fragmented security events into unified contextualized summaries by combining related log entries, authentication sequences, and access patterns into cohesive narratives. This merging process reduces data fragmentation and presents security insights in an integrated format that is easier to analyze

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If existing LLMs summarize cloud data without specific training, then the system is easier to deploy, but it fails to distinguish relevant from irrelevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment simplicityVSAvoidrelevant security information omitted
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training specialized summarization models on labeled security datasets and pre-configuring pattern recognition algorithms with security guidelines. This preliminary preparation enables the system to automatically distinguish relevant from irrelevant information without requiring complex real-time training, maintaining ease of deployment while preventing information loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250384074A1Large language model security summarization
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 ANDROMEDA SECURITY INC
  • US20250384074A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384074A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384074A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Cloud log data and contextual information is received. Knowledge is harvested from the cloud log data and the contextual information. The knowledge that is harvested is condensed by extracting security critical information from the knowledge. A human readable summary is generated by summarizing the condensed knowledge.