Cloud-Based Mobile Application for Remote Outdoor Grill Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing outdoor appliances like grills and smokers require manual or Bluetooth-controlled operation, limiting user interaction to proximity and offering limited functionality, preventing remote control and access to additional information or control signals.

Innovation Solution

A software application and user interface that enables remote control of electronically-controlled appliances by receiving user inputs, generating control instructions, and sending them to the appliance for execution, allowing communication with remote systems and providing a notification of availability and functionality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If Bluetooth radio is used for remote control, then user can control appliance from nearby location, but user must still be within proximity range and control options are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol range and functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary between the mobile device and the appliance. The mobile device communicates with the server, which then communicates with the appliance, enabling extended range control beyond direct Bluetooth connectivity. This mediator architecture allows users to control appliances from anywhere in the world, not just within proximity range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from local Bluetooth communication to cloud-based remote communication by adding the network dimension. Instead of direct peer-to-peer communication limited by physical range, the system uses a cloud server to bridge the communication gap, enabling control across any geographic distance through the network infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If manual controls are used, then appliance operation is simple and reliable, but user must be present at the appliance to make changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation reliabilityVSAvoidremote accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical controls with an electronic software-based control system. Instead of physically being at the appliance to turn knobs or press buttons, users interact with a graphical user interface on their mobile device, which transmits control signals through the network to the appliance, maintaining reliability while enabling remote operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If electronic controls with solenoids are used, then gas flow can be regulated precisely, but user still needs to be at the appliance to adjust settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas flow control precisionVSAvoiduser travel time to appliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service remote control where users can adjust gas flow and other appliance settings from their mobile devices without needing to physically travel to the appliance. The electronic controls with solenoids continue to provide precise regulation, while the remote interface eliminates the time loss associated with traveling to and from the appliance for routine adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12513235B2Mobile application for controlling outdoor grill
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 TRAEGER PELLET GRILLS LLC
  • US12513235B2 patent drawing
  • US12513235B2 patent drawing
  • US12513235B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to controlling an electronically-controlled appliance using a software application and providing a user interface for controlling an electronically-controlled appliance. In one scenario, a computer system receives an indication from a remote computing system indicating that an electronically-controlled appliance is communicably connected to the remote computing system. The computer system provides a notification in the software application indicating that the electronically-controlled appliance is available to receive instructions, and receives a user input at the software application indicating that certain functions are to be performed by the electronically-controlled appliance. The computer system further generates instructions configured to control the electronically-controlled appliance based on the functions specified in the received user input, and sends the generated instructions to the electronically-controlled appliance to perform the specified functions. These functions are then interpreted and carried out on the electronically-controlled appliance via the hardware controller.