Cloud Node Health Prediction From Pre-Deployment Failure Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cloud computing nodes experience hardware failures that lead to service interruptions, affecting user experience and provider capacity, with current methods focusing on reactive repairs rather than proactive prevention.

Innovation Solution

Implementing machine learning models to predict node failures early in the lifecycle by analyzing failure patterns and historical data, allowing for proactive corrective actions such as repair or replacement before deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reactive repair methods are used for node failures, then service restoration is achieved, but service interruption time is extended and reliability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode reliabilityVSAvoidservice interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting node failures before they occur in production using machine learning models that analyze failure patterns from pre-production testing. This allows corrective actions to be taken in advance during the pre-production phase, preventing service interruptions rather than responding to them after occurrence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring failure patterns during pre-production testing and using this information to update risk scores and predictions. The feedback loop enables the system to learn from actual failure data and improve its prediction accuracy over time, allowing for more reliable proactive identification of at-risk nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive failure analysis is performed on all nodes, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational resources and time are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by focusing comprehensive failure analysis only on specific pre-production nodes that exhibit risk indicators, rather than performing uniform analysis on all nodes. The machine learning model identifies which nodes require detailed scrutiny based on their testing patterns, concentrating computational resources where they are most needed to improve prediction accuracy efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting the depth and scope of failure analysis based on risk scores. Nodes with higher risk scores undergo more comprehensive analysis, while lower-risk nodes receive streamlined assessment. This parameter adjustment optimizes the balance between prediction accuracy and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If pre-production testing is extended to capture more failure patterns, then prediction reliability is improved, but deployment time is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoiddeployment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by performing extended failure pattern capture only for nodes that exhibit indicators of potential issues during initial testing. Rather than uniformly extending testing for all nodes, the system focuses additional testing resources on nodes showing risk patterns, thereby improving prediction reliability without proportionally increasing overall deployment time for the entire node fleet.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP4078372B1Node health prediction based on failure issues experienced prior to deployment in a cloud computing system
Publication Date: 2025.12.24 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • EP4078372B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4078372B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP4078372B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

To improve the reliability of nodes that are utilized by a cloud computing provider, information about the entire lifecycle of nodes can be collected and used to predict when nodes are likely to experience failures based at least in part on early lifecycle errors. In one aspect, a plurality of failure issues experienced by a plurality of production nodes in a cloud computing system during a pre-production phase can be identified. A subset of the plurality of failure issues can be selected based at least in part on correlation with service outages for the plurality of production nodes during a production phase. A comparison can be performed between the subset of the plurality of failure issues and a set of failure issues experienced by a pre-production node during the pre-production phase. A risk score for the pre-production node can be calculated based at least in part on the comparison.