Cloud Object Mirroring Across Fixed-Offset and Unified Layouts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Different cloud providers have varying data layout requirements, which complicates the use of a unified object format for storing and retrieving data across multiple cloud providers, leading to inefficient storage and loss of compression savings.

Innovation Solution

A custom mirroring operation that adapts to the specific data layout requirements of each cloud provider, dynamically selecting compression algorithms and formatting data to create mirrored objects in a unified object format, ensuring efficient storage and cost savings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a unified object format is used to store data across multiple cloud providers, then data portability and storage efficiency are improved, but compatibility with different cloud providers' data layout requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata portabilityVSAvoidcompatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The object is segmented into multiple sections: a header section containing metadata and a data section containing the actual data. This segmentation allows the unified object format to maintain a consistent structure while accommodating different cloud providers' data layout requirements in the data section, thus resolving the contradiction between data portability and compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as compression algorithms and data layout configurations based on the target cloud provider's requirements. This allows the unified object format to adapt to different cloud providers while maintaining core compatibility, resolving the contradiction between versatility and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If data is stored without compression to meet fixed offset requirements, then compatibility with certain cloud providers is improved, but storage efficiency and cost savings deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecompatibilityVSAvoidstorage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Compression is performed in advance during the object creation process, and compression metadata is recorded in the header section. This preliminary compression action allows the data to be stored in a compressed state while maintaining compatibility with cloud providers that require fixed offsets, as the compression information is properly tracked and managed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The header section acts as an intermediary that stores compression metadata and mapping information. This intermediary structure enables the system to maintain compressed data in the data section while providing the fixed offset compatibility required by certain cloud providers, thus resolving the contradiction between compatibility and storage efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of substance

If compression algorithms are dynamically selected for different cloud providers, then storage efficiency is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage costVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes compression algorithm parameters based on the target cloud provider's characteristics and the data being stored. This parameter adaptation allows optimization of storage costs while managing complexity through a standardized interface that abstracts the underlying algorithm selection and configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260010438A1Mirroring objects between different cloud providers with different data layout requirements
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 NETAPP INC
  • US20260010438A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010438A1 patent drawing
  • US20260010438A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are provided for mirroring objects between object stores hosted by cloud providers that have different data layout requirements. An object may be stored within a first object store that supports a fix offset format where uncompressed data is stored according to fixed offsets and boundaries within fixed size objects. A mirroring operation may be used to mirror the object to a second object store that supports a unified object format where compressed data can be stored at non-fixed offsets and boundaries within variable sized objects. The mirroring operation selects a compression algorithm and compresses the object on the fly to create a mirrored object having the unified object format. The mirrored object, populated with the compressed data and slot header metadata comprising compression information for how to locate and decompress the data in the mirrored object, is stored into the second object store.