Cloud Orchestration System for Regulatory Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cloud orchestration systems prioritize resource maximization over compliance with geographical, legal, and regulatory considerations, leading to potential violations and unintended consequences for clients and providers.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that optimize shared services orchestration by considering client requirements and applicable rules and regulations, including automatic detection of rule changes and alerts, to ensure compliant resource deployment and management in cloud computing environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If cloud resources are deployed based on cost and availability without considering geographical and regulatory rules, then resource allocation efficiency is improved, but compliance with laws and regulations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidcompliance with laws and regulations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining and storing a list of applicable rules before deploying cloud resources. The orchestration process queries these pre-established rules to ensure compliance is checked in advance, preventing violations rather than detecting them after deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary compliance checking mechanism between resource selection and deployment. This intermediary layer evaluates potential resource allocations against stored rules, acting as a mediator that reconciles the conflict between efficient allocation and regulatory compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If cloud orchestration automatically selects resources without client requirements input, then orchestration speed is improved, but client-specific compliance needs deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorchestration speedVSAvoidclient-specific compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal rules determination process that handles multiple compliance dimensions simultaneously. The same orchestration framework accommodates both automatic resource selection and client-specific requirements by querying a comprehensive rule set that includes geographical, regulatory, and client-defined constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Client requirements and applicable rules are determined preliminarily before the actual resource deployment process. This allows the orchestration to proceed quickly once parameters are set, while ensuring all compliance considerations are pre-evaluated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If rule changes are not monitored and alerted, then system simplicity is improved, but operational safety and trust deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidoperational safety and trust
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism that monitors for changes in applicable rules and notifies relevant parties. When rule changes are detected, the system provides feedback to clients and providers, ensuring ongoing compliance and maintaining trust through transparency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance monitoring system operates autonomously to detect rule changes and generate notifications without requiring manual intervention. This self-service approach maintains operational safety while minimizing added complexity, as the system automatically manages the monitoring and alerting functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10140163B2Intelligent framework for shared services orchestration
Publication Date: 2018.11.27 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10140163B2 patent drawing
  • US10140163B2 patent drawing
  • US10140163B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present invention disclose a method for optimizing shared services orchestration. The method includes one or more computer processors receiving resource requirements from a client. The method further includes one or more computer processors determining a list of rules. The method further includes one or more computer processors determining at least one resource based on the resource requirements and the list of rules. The method further includes one or more computer processors deploying at least one resource from the determined at least one resource.