Semi-Automated Cloud Planning Console for Project Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current project planning and management tools in cloud computing infrastructures face complexity and user control issues due to automatic updates of project tasks, leading to frequent timeline changes and confusion in managing project delays.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated planning console in a cloud computing environment that allows users to manage project task parameters based on dependency relationships, providing user-selectable interaction points to either update or maintain the timing of successor tasks based on actual timing differences of predecessor tasks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If project tasks are automatically updated when a predecessor task is delayed, then the project timeline reflects actual progress, but user control over the project schedule is reduced and confusion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimeline accuracyVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically switches between manual and automatic update modes based on user selection. The planning console allows users to choose whether to automatically update successor tasks when predecessor tasks are delayed, making the system adaptable to different user preferences and project management styles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users about timing differences between planned and actual task completion. When a predecessor task is completed earlier or later than planned, the system notifies the user and waits for confirmation before updating successor tasks, ensuring users are informed of timeline changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If project tasks are automatically updated frequently to reflect delays, then the timeline remains current, but stability and clarity of the project schedule deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetimeline currentnessVSAvoidschedule stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies automatic updates selectively rather than universally. Users can choose to update only specific successor tasks when a predecessor task is delayed, allowing partial updates that maintain necessary currentness while avoiding unnecessary changes that would reduce schedule stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback about timing differences and waits for user confirmation before executing updates. This feedback mechanism prevents excessive automatic updates by allowing users to review and approve changes, thereby maintaining schedule stability while keeping the timeline current when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If manual updates of project tasks are required for each delay, then user control is maintained, but the complexity of project management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts its operation mode based on user selection. Users can switch between manual update mode (maintaining full control) and automatic update mode (reducing management effort), making the system flexible enough to handle different project complexity levels and user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system can automatically perform update operations when configured to do so, reducing the manual effort required for project management. When automatic updates are enabled, the system self-services by automatically adjusting successor task timelines based on predecessor task completion, reducing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11373124B2System and method for a control based project scheduling mode
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 SERVICENOW INC
  • US11373124B2 patent drawing
  • US11373124B2 patent drawing
  • US11373124B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods may include a cloud computing system configured to execute instructions to generate a planning console accessible from an instance provided on a client network, wherein the planning console includes a semi-automated scheduling mode and a project with a plurality of project tasks that include a predecessor task with a planned timing, and wherein executing the instructions includes determining at least one dependency relationship between the predecessor task and at least one successor task, identifying a timing difference between the planned timing and an actual timing of the predecessor task, and generating an one or more user-selectable interaction points, in the semi-automated scheduling mode, to automatically update the project such that the at least one successor task is modified based on the actual timing of the at least one predecessor task and interaction with a second interaction point causes the project to remain the same.