Cloud Resource Timeline for Security and Change Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Complex cloud infrastructure deployments face challenges due to improper configuration, lack of security focus, and varying developer experience, making it difficult to monitor and manage changes across microservices and serverless architectures, leading to increased vulnerability and risk.

Innovation Solution

A cloud-based system that provides a timeline of resource lifecycle events from blueprint to deployment, utilizing data mesh for querying and filtering resource data, and offering a graphical user interface for chronological presentation, along with posture control for integrated security from build to run, using machine learning and advanced threat correlation for risk prioritization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If developers deploy infrastructure rapidly with microservices and serverless architectures, then productivity and innovation speed improve, but security vulnerability and configuration errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidsecurity vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary security checks and configuration validation before infrastructure deployment. By analyzing blueprints and configurations in advance, the system identifies and remediates security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations prior to deployment, enabling rapid development without compromising security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor infrastructure changes in real-time. When unauthorized or problematic changes are detected, the system automatically triggers alerts and remediation actions, creating a closed-loop security system that responds dynamically to deployment activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple developers work on the same infrastructure, then collaboration and functionality improve, but difficulty in tracking changes and pinpointing issues increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration capabilityVSAvoidchange tracking difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments infrastructure resources into distinct entities (compute, storage, networking, security) and tracks changes to each segment independently. This segmentation allows multiple developers to work on different components simultaneously while maintaining clear audit trails and reducing the complexity of change tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension to infrastructure monitoring by maintaining chronological histories of all changes. By organizing change data in time sequences, the system enables developers to trace the evolution of infrastructure over time, making it easier to identify when and who made specific changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If comprehensive monitoring of all cloud resources is implemented, then security and compliance improve, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity postureVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses monitoring on the most critical security-relevant events and configurations. By filtering and prioritizing data based on security impact, the system provides comprehensive security monitoring while reducing the complexity of processing all available cloud data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal monitoring framework that handles multiple data types (compute, storage, networking, security, IAM) through a single integrated platform. This multi-functional approach consolidates monitoring complexity into one system rather than requiring separate solutions for each resource type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Speed

If real-time data processing and analysis are performed, then threat detection and response speed improve, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat response speedVSAvoidprocessing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and threat detection rules in advance, preparing analysis frameworks before threats occur. By pre-configuring detection logic and having processing pipelines ready, the system can respond to threats rapidly without requiring intensive real-time computational resources for every event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240370305A1Time series analysis for cloud resources
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 ZSCALER INC
  • US20240370305A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370305A1 patent drawing
  • US20240370305A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure includes systems and methods for time series analysis for cloud resources. Various embodiments include receiving resource data from one or more subsystems of a cloud environment, the resource data including information related to a plurality of events associated with one or more resources in the cloud environment; storing and processing the resource data; and presenting the resource data in a chronological order based on a time associated with each of the plurality of events.