Cloud Infrastructure Proactive Troubleshooting via Rule Learning Engines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cloud management tools struggle to efficiently detect and troubleshoot performance problems in cloud infrastructure, leading to time-consuming and error-prone processes that are costly for application owners.

Innovation Solution

An automated computer-implemented method and system that uses a graphical user interface to enable users to select key performance indicators (KPIs) for cloud infrastructure components, deploying separate rule learning engines to generate rules for detecting problems, and automatically executing remedial measures to resolve issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual troubleshooting processes are used by teams of engineers, then problems can be diagnosed and resolved, but the process becomes time-consuming and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem resolution capabilityVSAvoidtroubleshooting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively detecting performance degradation trends before they become critical failures. The proactive problem detection mechanism continuously monitors cloud infrastructure metrics and identifies emerging issues, allowing remediation to be initiated before complete system failure occurs, thus reducing troubleshooting time while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by implementing automated root cause analysis and remediation execution. The intelligent system autonomously analyzes performance data, identifies root causes without human intervention, and executes predetermined remediation actions, eliminating the need for manual troubleshooting by engineering teams and significantly reducing both time and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual troubleshooting processes are used by teams of engineers, then problems can be diagnosed and resolved, but the cost increases due to lost revenue and engineering resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem resolution capabilityVSAvoidcost of engineering resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by implementing automated root cause analysis and remediation execution. The intelligent system autonomously analyzes performance data, identifies root causes without human intervention, and executes predetermined remediation actions, eliminating the need for manual troubleshooting by engineering teams and significantly reducing both time and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring cloud infrastructure performance metrics and using this information to drive automated remediation. The closed-loop system learns from performance data, adjusts its detection algorithms, and refines remediation strategies over time, improving reliability while reducing the need for expensive human engineering resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If cloud management tools generate alerts, then performance problems can be detected, but the alerts cannot be understood or used to diagnose the underlying problem

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance problem detectionVSAvoiddiagnostic information
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between performance monitoring and diagnostic analysis. The intelligent platform acts as a mediator that translates raw performance metrics and alerts into meaningful diagnostic information by correlating multiple data sources, identifying patterns, and presenting actionable insights that bridge the gap between detection and diagnosis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual alert analysis with intelligent automated analysis. Machine learning algorithms and analytical engines substitute for human engineer analysis, automatically interpreting alerts, correlating performance data, and generating diagnostic conclusions, thereby preventing loss of diagnostic information while improving detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If knowledge gained by engineering teams is not shared, then individual team expertise is maintained, but subsequent teams cannot efficiently diagnose similar problems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge sharing capabilityVSAvoidtime to diagnose similar problems
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by creating a centralized knowledge repository that serves multiple engineering teams and applications. The platform captures diagnostic knowledge, root cause analyses, and remediation procedures in a universal format that can be applied across different cloud infrastructure environments and problem scenarios, enabling any team to benefit from previously gained knowledge and significantly reducing diagnosis time for similar problems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250111251A1Methods and systems for proactive problem troubleshooting and resolution in a cloud infrastructure
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 VMWARE INC
  • US20250111251A1 patent drawing
  • US20250111251A1 patent drawing
  • US20250111251A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated computer-implemented methods and systems for troubleshooting and resolving problems with objects of a cloud infrastructure are described herein. In response to detecting abnormal behavior of an object running in the cloud infrastructure based on a key performance indicator (“KPI”) of the object, a graphical user interface (“GUI”) is displayed to enable a user to select KPIs of components of the object. For each of the components, a separate rule learning engine is deployed to generate rules for detecting a problem with the component based on the KPI of the object and the KPIs of the component. The rules are subsequently used to detect a runtime problem with the object and display in the GUI remedial measures for resolving the problem. Remedial measures are automatically executed to resolve the problem with the object via the GUI.