Cloud Security Configuration Using AI Context Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining appropriate security configurations for cloud services is challenging due to the complexity and dynamic nature of cloud computing environments, requiring significant administrative effort and expertise, and is often inadequate to protect against malicious attacks.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing artificial intelligence, specifically a prediction model trained with contextual information from cloud services, to automatically determine and implement recommended security configurations, including deploying agents to collect data and using machine learning to identify security postures and generate proactive security recommendations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual security configuration methods are used in cloud environments, then security settings can be customized, but the complexity and time required for configuration increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity configurationVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables security configurations to determine and apply appropriate security settings automatically without requiring manual administrator intervention. The security configuration manager autonomously analyzes contextual information, generates security postures, and applies configurations, allowing the system to serve itself rather than relying on human operators for each configuration decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary security assessments and determines appropriate security configurations before potential threats or issues arise. By continuously analyzing contextual information and maintaining updated security postures in advance, the system prepares security configurations proactively rather than reactively responding to incidents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If manual security configuration methods are used in cloud environments, then security settings can be customized, but the time required for configuration increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity configurationVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The security configuration manager automatically performs the entire security configuration process including analysis, determination, and application of security settings without human intervention, dramatically reducing the time required compared to manual methods while maintaining or improving configuration quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system operates continuously to monitor contextual information, update security postures, and maintain optimal security configurations in real-time rather than performing periodic manual updates. This continuous operation ensures security settings are always current without requiring repeated manual intervention cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If traditional security monitoring is used in cloud environments, then basic security can be maintained, but the ability to identify potential threats and vulnerabilities is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity postureVSAvoidthreat detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects contextual information from multiple sources including cloud service configurations, network traffic data, and security events. This feedback loop enables the security configuration manager to analyze current security states, identify potential threats and vulnerabilities, and dynamically adjust security postures based on real-time conditions rather than relying on static traditional monitoring rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical security monitoring approaches with AI-based prediction models that analyze contextual information and predict security postures. This substitution enables more sophisticated threat detection and vulnerability identification capabilities that go beyond the limitations of conventional rule-based or signature-based monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12531910B2Cybersecurity configuration in a cloud environment
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 SOPHOS LTD
  • US12531910B2 patent drawing
  • US12531910B2 patent drawing
  • US12531910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present teachings include automatically determining the recommended security configuration of a first cloud service within a cloud computing network. This may include detecting a change in the cloud computing network relating to a second cloud service being deployed within the cloud computing network, and in response, obtaining contextual information related to the configuration and operation of the first cloud service, the contextual information including information related to the second cloud service. The contextual information may be provided to a prediction model operable to identify a security posture from input contextual information for obtaining a recommended security posture from the prediction model based on the contextual information provided thereto. Aspects may further include determining a security recommendation for the first cloud service based on a comparison of a current security posture of the first cloud service and the recommended security posture.