Cloud Security Group Rule Management Through Packet Log Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing security group rules in cloud environments is complex and prone to inefficiencies, leading to increased attack vectors due to overlapping and unused rules, which slows down network transmissions and compromises security.

Innovation Solution

A computing device analyzes packet logs to identify the least permissive and most specific security group rules, disabling unused and shadowed rules to streamline the rule set and prioritize the least permissive rules, thereby reducing attack vectors and improving network speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple security group rules are configured to protect against various attacks, then security coverage is improved, but rule complexity increases and processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidrule complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of rule evaluation by introducing a permissiveness score that quantifies how restrictive each rule is. Rules are sorted and evaluated based on this parameter, allowing the system to automatically identify and disable overly permissive rules while maintaining security coverage. This transforms the complex qualitative assessment of rule necessity into a quantitative parameter-driven process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables security group rules to self-evaluate their own necessity by automatically analyzing packet flows and determining which rules are actually being used. The system performs self-service by autonomously identifying shadowed rules and disabling them without manual intervention, reducing rule complexity while maintaining security posture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If numerous security group rules are maintained to cover all possible attack vectors, then security posture is improved, but processing speed of packet filtering deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity postureVSAvoidpacket filtering speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and removes unnecessary rules from the security group rule set by analyzing packet flows and identifying rules that are not being used or are shadowed by more restrictive rules. By taking out these redundant rules, the system reduces the total number of rules that need to be processed, thereby improving packet filtering speed while maintaining security posture through the retention of essential rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system discards shadowed and unused security group rules that are consuming processing resources without providing security value. The monitoring system continuously recovers from suboptimal security configurations by identifying and removing redundant rules, ensuring that only necessary rules remain active for packet filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of operation

If security group rules are made more permissive to allow legitimate traffic, then ease of operation is improved, but attack vector possibilities increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow accessibilityVSAvoidattack vector possibilities
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring packet flows and using this information to evaluate the actual necessity of each security group rule. The monitoring system provides feedback on which rules are being used and which are shadowed, enabling automatic adjustment of the rule set to maintain the least permissive necessary posture while allowing legitimate traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system makes the security group rule set dynamic by automatically adjusting which rules are active based on observed packet flows. Rather than maintaining a static set of rules, the system dynamically identifies and disables shadowed rules while keeping necessary rules active, adapting the security posture to actual traffic patterns and reducing attack vectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12438880B2Cloud security group rule management via log processing
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12438880B2 patent drawing
  • US12438880B2 patent drawing
  • US12438880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatuses are described herein for automatically managing security group rules in a cloud environment by analyzing utilization of each of the security group rules based on packet logs so as to reduce attack vector possibilities. A computing device may receive a first log comprising a plurality of log entries that each indicate one or more packet flows associated with a security group attached to a cloud resource. A plurality of security group rules may be sorted in an order based on their permissiveness. The computing device may identify, for each log entry of the plurality of log entries, a corresponding security group rule of the plurality of security group rules by iteratively processing, based on traffic pattern matching characteristics and the order, the sorted plurality of security group rules to identify a least permissive security group rule. Rules tagged as unused and/or shadowed may be removed.