Cloud Security Policy Enforcement Framework for Tenant Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cloud-based PaaS systems face significant security challenges due to ambiguous security boundaries among tenants sharing the same operating system, particularly in heterogeneous environments, leading to inefficiencies in manual configuration of virtualized infrastructure and security policies, which hinders widespread adoption.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a security policy enforcement framework within the PaaS layer that automatically analyzes and enforces security policies across cloud infrastructure, using a policy analyzer, runtime controller, operating system controller, and hypervisor controller to provide logical isolation among tenants without requiring a homogeneous software stack or manual configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual configuration of virtualized infrastructure and security policies is used, then security isolation can be provided, but the process is inefficient and not readily scalable to large numbers of tenants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity isolationVSAvoidconfiguration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically discovers security capabilities of platform components and generates security policies without manual intervention. The policy analyzer autonomously analyzes configuration information, identifies security policies, and controls application execution, enabling the system to serve itself rather than requiring manual configuration for each tenant.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The framework dynamically adjusts security policy parameters based on the analyzed configuration information and identified security capabilities. Security policies are not static but are generated and modified according to the specific platform configuration and tenant requirements, allowing efficient adaptation to different scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a homogeneous software stack is used to address security issues, then security boundaries can be clarified, but application flexibility and runtime environment diversity are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity boundary clarityVSAvoidapplication runtime diversity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The framework applies different security analysis and enforcement strategies to different platform components based on their specific security capabilities. Each component (runtime, OS, hypervisor, PaaS controller) is analyzed individually, and security policies are tailored to the local characteristics of each component rather than imposing a uniform approach across the entire stack.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The policy analyzer serves multiple functions: it discovers security capabilities, analyzes configuration information, identifies security policies, and controls application execution. This multi-functional approach allows the system to handle diverse runtime environments while maintaining security boundaries through a single universal framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If logical isolation is implemented among tenant applications in the same operating system, then security boundaries can be maintained in PaaS environments, but the complexity of managing heterogeneous runtimes and operating systems increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetenant isolationVSAvoidplatform management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The policy analyzer acts as an intermediary between the heterogeneous platform components and the security policy enforcement mechanism. It abstracts the complexity of different runtimes and operating systems by providing a unified interface for security analysis and policy identification, thereby simplifying the management of logical isolation across diverse platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The framework segments the security enforcement process into distinct components: security capability discovery, configuration analysis, policy identification, and execution control. This segmentation allows each component to be independently managed and optimized, reducing the overall complexity of implementing logical isolation in heterogeneous environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8689282B1Security policy enforcement framework for cloud-based information processing systems
Publication Date: 2014.04.01 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US8689282B1 patent drawing
  • US8689282B1 patent drawing
  • US8689282B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Cloud infrastructure of a cloud service provider comprises a processing platform implementing a security policy enforcement framework. The security policy enforcement framework comprises a policy analyzer that is configured to identify at least one security policy associated with at least one tenant of the cloud service provider, to analyze the security policy against configuration information characterizing the cloud infrastructure of the cloud service provider, and to control execution of one or more applications of said at least one tenant within the cloud infrastructure in accordance with the security policy, based at least in part on one or more results of the analysis of the security policy. The security policy enforcement framework may be implemented in a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) layer of the cloud infrastructure, and may comprise a runtime controller, an operating system controller, a hypervisor controller and a PaaS controller.