Cloud Simulation for Rail Unmanned Driving Fault Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rail transit full-automatic unmanned driving verification systems face high development and construction costs, space inefficiencies, compatibility issues, and scalability limitations due to the use of numerous physical hardware devices, making it difficult to implement multi-discipline integration and cross-discipline linkage.

Innovation Solution

A cloud simulation apparatus and method that includes a cloud access terminal and a cloud server terminal with modules for central dispatching, station control, rail-mounted operations, and interface logic management, utilizing software simulation and virtualization to integrate and verify rail transit full-automatic unmanned driving scenes without the need for extensive physical hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all real hardware devices are adopted for verification, then verification accuracy is improved, but cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoiddevelopment and construction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses virtualization technology to create virtual copies of hardware devices (signal systems, platform doors, vehicles, communication systems, etc.) instead of using all physical hardware. These virtual devices are deployed on cloud servers, allowing comprehensive verification without the need for expensive physical hardware for every subsystem, thus reducing development and construction costs while maintaining verification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The cloud-based verification platform is designed to support multiple verification scenarios and subsystems through a unified virtualized architecture. The same cloud infrastructure can simulate different rail transit subsystems (signal, door, vehicle, communication) and integrate them for comprehensive verification, eliminating the need for separate verification systems for each subsystem and reducing overall costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If all real hardware devices are adopted for verification, then verification completeness is improved, but space occupation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification completenessVSAvoidspace occupation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent virtualizes hardware devices and deploys them on cloud servers, which can be accessed remotely. This eliminates the need for physical space to house all verification hardware devices on-site, as the virtualized systems are hosted in remote data centers and accessed through network connections, significantly reducing space occupation while maintaining verification completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If most devices are formed by hardware physical devices, then device functionality is ensured, but compatibility and scalability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice functionalityVSAvoidcompatibility and scalability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a unified cloud-based verification platform that can simulate multiple different rail transit subsystems (signal, platform door, vehicle, communication, fare collection, etc.) through virtualized software modules. This universal platform can adapt to different verification scenarios and integrate various subsystems through standardized interfaces, greatly improving compatibility and scalability compared to using separate physical hardware for each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The virtualized verification system allows dynamic configuration and modification of system parameters, device characteristics, and interaction behaviors through software. This enables flexible adjustment of verification scenarios, integration of new subsystems, and adaptation to different rail transit line requirements without physical hardware modifications, enhancing both compatibility and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If a large quantity of physical hardwares are used, then verification coverage is improved, but management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification coverageVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates the management of multiple virtualized verification devices and subsystems into a single cloud-based management platform. This unified system provides centralized control, configuration, and monitoring capabilities for all verification resources, eliminating the need to manage each physical hardware device separately and significantly reducing management complexity while maintaining comprehensive verification coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12020574B2Cloud simulation apparatus and method for verifying rail transit-oriented full-automatic unmanned driving scene
Publication Date: 2024.06.25 CASCO SIGNAL LTD
  • US12020574B2 patent drawing
  • US12020574B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a cloud simulation apparatus and method for verifying a rail transit-oriented full-automatic unmanned driving scene, where the apparatus includes a cloud access terminal and a cloud server terminal. The cloud server terminal includes a central dispatching module, a station control module, a rail-mounted module, an interface logic management layer, and a device base layer, the cloud access terminal is connected to the central dispatching module, the central dispatching module is connected to the station control module and the rail-mounted module respectively, every two of the station control module, the rail-mounted module, and the interface logic management layer are connected, and the interface logic management layer is connected to the device base layer. Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the advantages that a fault injection test can be performed flexibly, a function test under degradation and emergency operation scenes can be performed more comprehensively, and a large-scale verification work on site can be avoided, and the like.