Cloud Site Automation for Versioned Hardware Interoperability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cloud computing infrastructure deployment processes are prone to errors and require significant manual intervention, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistencies in hardware and software configuration.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for automating the installation and configuration of cloud computing hardware and software using a network software repository, installation system, and machine learning algorithms to ensure error-free deployment and interoperability among components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual intervention is used for hardware and software configuration, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but error rates increase and deployment efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment accuracyVSAvoiddeployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service deployment where the cloud computing environment automatically configures hardware and software components without manual intervention. The automated workflow engine executes pre-defined deployment scripts and configuration routines, allowing the system to deploy and configure itself while maintaining high accuracy and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary configuration and validation actions before actual deployment. Deployment templates and scripts are pre-configured with best practices and validation rules, ensuring that when deployment occurs, it executes accurately and efficiently without manual intervention during the critical deployment phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If manual configuration processes are used, then operator control is maintained, but consistency and reliability of deployment decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment consistencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated deployment system is segmented into distinct modular components including a workflow engine, configuration management module, validation module, and logging module. Each component handles specific aspects of deployment, making the overall complex system manageable through clear separation of concerns while ensuring consistent and reliable execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing deployment configurations through templates where variables can be adjusted without changing the underlying deployment logic. This allows consistent deployment patterns to be reused across different environments by simply changing parameters rather than rewriting complex configuration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated deployment is implemented, then deployment speed and consistency improve, but initial system setup complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidautomation infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated deployment system is designed as a universal platform that can deploy multiple types of cloud computing environments (virtual machines, containers, storage systems) using a single unified interface and workflow engine. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate automation tools for different deployment scenarios, managing infrastructure complexity while maintaining high deployment speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses deployment templates that can be copied and reused across multiple deployments. Once a deployment configuration is validated and working, it can be replicated indefinitely with minimal additional setup effort, allowing rapid deployment scaling without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If version control is applied to algorithms, then software reliability and traceability improve, but management overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware traceabilityVSAvoidversion management time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The version control system provides automated feedback mechanisms that track algorithm versions, deployment status, and performance metrics. When an algorithm is updated, the system automatically notifies relevant stakeholders, validates the new version, and maintains an audit trail, reducing manual version management overhead while improving traceability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12461729B2Cloud automation site design and method
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM USA INC
  • US12461729B2 patent drawing
  • US12461729B2 patent drawing
  • US12461729B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for configuring a network, comprising a network software repository operating on a first processor and configured to store one or more algorithms for each of a plurality of hardware items and to implement version control for each of the one or more algorithms. A network software installation system operating on a second processor is configured to install a current version of one or more algorithms on each of a plurality of site-specific hardware items and to configure each of the plurality of site-specific hardware items to interoperate with each other.