Cloud Spatial Impact Analysis for CAD Conflict Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CAD systems fail to detect spatial conflicts in real-time, leading to costly rework and delays, as designers working on massive assemblies in the same spatial area often make conflicting changes that are not visible until later in the design process.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for 3D spatial impact analysis that uses a cloud-based conflict analysis server to detect and analyze spatial conflicts, providing real-time notifications and graphical feedback to clients, enabling immediate resolution of conflicts through a scalable cloud service and message broker system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If designers work concurrently on massive assemblies in the same spatial area, then productivity is improved, but spatial conflicts are not detected until later causing rework and delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrent design productivityVSAvoidconflict detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by continuously monitoring spatial changes in the CAx model and immediately notifying affected designers when conflicts are detected. The notification system provides instant feedback about spatial impacts, allowing designers to adjust their work before conflicts become problems, thus maintaining both high productivity and reliable conflict detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary between multiple client systems working on the same assembly. It receives change notifications from clients, performs spatial impact analysis, and distributes conflict information back to relevant clients. This intermediary mechanism enables concurrent design while ensuring reliable conflict detection through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If real-time impact detection is implemented, then conflict detection reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconflict detection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex conflict detection task into manageable components: clients generate change notifications, the server receives and processes these notifications, performs spatial impact analysis using stored impact definitions, and sends targeted notifications to affected clients. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity by distributing functions across multiple independent components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Impact definitions are pre-stored in the system, defining spatial relationships and conflict criteria before actual design work begins. This preliminary preparation allows the system to perform rapid conflict detection during concurrent design without complex real-time calculations, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive impact analysis is performed on all spatial changes, then measurement precision is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact analysis precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs impact analysis only on locally affected spatial areas rather than analyzing the entire assembly. When a change is detected, the server identifies the specific spatial region impacted and analyzes only that local area using pre-defined impact definitions. This approach maintains high measurement precision for affected areas while minimizing processing time by avoiding unnecessary analysis of unaffected regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial impact analysis by focusing only on the minimum necessary spatial changes required to detect conflicts. Rather than analyzing all possible impacts, it applies impact definitions selectively to changes that actually affect spatial relationships, achieving sufficient precision for conflict detection without excessive processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20220215136A1System and method for multi-user spatial impact analysis and management
Publication Date: 2022.07.07 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC
  • US20220215136A1 patent drawing
  • US20220215136A1 patent drawing
  • US20220215136A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods for CAD operations and corresponding systems and computer-readable mediums are disclosed herein. A method includes accessing (302), by a data processing system (202, 500), a computer-aided design, engineering, visualization, or manufacturing (CAx) model (208) of a part or assembly to be manufactured. The method includes storing (304) a plurality of impact definitions (204) corresponding to the CAx model (208). The method includes receiving (306), from a first client system (220A), an indication of a first spatial area of the CAx model (208) and, from a second client system (220B), an indication of a second spatial area of the CAx model (208). The method includes receiving (308) a notification of a save event created by the first client system (220A) for the first spatial area. The method includes performing impact detection (310) according to the save event, the first spatial area, and the impact definitions (204) to detect a potential impact. The method includes sending (312) an impact notification to the first client system (220A) and the second client system (220B).