Cloud Energy Storage MPC for Grid Auxiliary Service Dispatch

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cloud energy storage systems are unable to participate in grid auxiliary services, such as frequency modulation and peak shaving, and do not maximize the value of energy storage resources.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method involves establishing a model predictive control model that allows cloud energy storage service providers to participate in grid auxiliary services by optimizing charging and discharging instructions based on current and predicted operating parameters, including power constraints and penalty/reward structures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If cloud energy storage systems operate independently without grid auxiliary services, then system simplicity is maintained, but energy storage resource utilization is not maximized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticipation in grid auxiliary servicesVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into modular components: objective function module, constraint condition module, prediction module, and decision variable calculation module. Each module handles specific aspects of grid auxiliary services independently, allowing the system to participate in multiple services while maintaining manageable complexity through functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The model predictive control framework is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple grid auxiliary services including frequency modulation, peak shaving, and reserve provision. The same control structure adapts to different service requirements by adjusting objective functions and constraints, enabling one system to perform multiple functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If charging and discharging timing is fixed, then operational simplicity is maintained, but energy storage resource utilization cannot be optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy storage resource utilizationVSAvoidoperational decision-making complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary prediction of future operating parameters (electricity prices, load demands, renewable generation) and pre-calculates optimal charging and discharging schedules. By anticipating future conditions and preparing decision variables in advance, the system optimizes energy storage utilization without requiring complex real-time operational decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system continuously monitors actual operating parameters and compares them with predicted values, using this feedback to adjust subsequent charging and discharging decisions. This closed-loop approach enables adaptive optimization of energy storage utilization while automating operational complexity through systematic feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If real-time optimization is implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements optimization at regular decision cycles rather than continuous real-time optimization. At each decision cycle, the model predictive control model calculates optimal charging and discharging powers based on current and predicted parameters. This periodic approach maintains operational efficiency while reducing computational burden compared to continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12224589B2Operation decision-making method for centralized cloud energy storage capable of participating in power grid auxiliary services
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY
  • US12224589B2 patent drawing
  • US12224589B2 patent drawing
  • US12224589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An operation decision-making method for centralized cloud energy storage capable of participating in power grid auxiliary services. The method includes: establishing a model predictive control model; obtaining operating parameters of the current period t from a grid control center at a beginning of a current decision-making cycle; predicting operating parameters within the predetermined time range based on historical data; obtaining decision variables according to the model predictive control model, the operating parameters of the current period and the operating parameters within the predetermined time range; setting a charging power of the centralized energy storage facility in the current period t and a discharging power according to the decision variables; obtaining an actual power of the centralized energy storage facility at an end of the current period t through sensors installed on the centralized energy storage facility as a parameter for a next decision period.