Cloud Vehicle Alerting via Road Characteristic Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cloud-based safety systems face challenges in avoiding over-alerting, which leads to alert fatigue, especially since many objects that pose roadway hazards are not equipped to explicitly notify the system, and manually evaluating each hazard is impractical.

Innovation Solution

A method implemented in a cloud computing system that receives digital data with location information about an object, determines the characteristic of the road corresponding to that location, and initiates a digital alerting operation for nearby vehicles based on the road characteristic and additional factors related to the object.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If explicit notification equipment is installed on all objects to enable them to notify the cloud-based safety system, then the system can detect more roadway hazards, but the infrastructure cost and device complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection capabilityVSAvoidinfrastructure cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing telematics devices and sensors already present in vehicles and on road objects to automatically detect and report hazards. Objects serve themselves by utilizing their own embedded sensors (cameras, LIDAR, GPS, vehicle status sensors) to generate hazard notifications without requiring additional dedicated alerting equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The cloud-based safety system processes multiple types of data from diverse sources (vehicles, road sensors, weather systems, traffic cameras) through a unified platform. The system can handle various hazard types (stationary vehicles, debris, weather conditions, traffic patterns) using the same infrastructure, eliminating the need for specialized equipment for each hazard type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If manual evaluation of every potential roadway hazard is performed, then alert accuracy improves, but the time consumption and productivity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealert accuracyVSAvoidhazard evaluation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual human evaluation with automated artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms. These algorithms analyze sensor data, identify hazard patterns, and generate alerts automatically, achieving both high accuracy through sophisticated pattern recognition and high productivity through rapid automated processing of multiple data streams simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where alert outcomes and hazard verification data are fed back into the AI models to improve future detection accuracy. This allows the system to learn from past performance, refine hazard identification algorithms, and maintain high accuracy while processing increasing volumes of data at automated speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If digital alerts are sent for every detected hazard, then roadway safety information completeness improves, but alert fatigue increases due to over-alerting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety information completenessVSAvoidalert fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different alerting strategies based on local conditions and hazard characteristics. Critical hazards (e.g., stationary vehicles on highways, debris in travel lanes) trigger immediate high-priority alerts, while less critical conditions (e.g., minor weather variations, non-blocking obstacles) may receive delayed or suppressed notifications. This localized quality control ensures information completeness for serious hazards while filtering out low-priority alerts that contribute to fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts alert parameters such as notification timing, message priority, and delivery method based on hazard severity, vehicle location, traffic conditions, and driver behavior patterns. By changing these parameters adaptively, the system maintains comprehensive safety information delivery while optimizing alert relevance to prevent driver desensitization and fatigue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12249241B2Methods and systems for digital alerting of vehicles based on a characteristic of a road and at least one factor corresponding to an object
Publication Date: 2025.03.11 HAAS INC
  • US12249241B2 patent drawing
  • US12249241B2 patent drawing
  • US12249241B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of a method, a non-transitory computer readable medium, and a system for vehicle alerting are disclosed. In an example, a computer-implemented method for alerting vehicles, the method including receiving, at a cloud computing system, digital data that includes location information about an object, determining, by the cloud computing system, a characteristic of a road that corresponds to the location information, and initiating, by the cloud computing system, a digital alerting operation for nearby vehicles in response to the characteristic of the road and at least one additional factor that corresponds to the object.