Cloud Wi-Fi Connectivity Management for Moving Things

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication networks are inadequate for supporting complex arrays of both moving and static nodes, such as those found in autonomous vehicle networks and the Internet of Moving Things, as they fail to provide reliable, scalable, and efficient connectivity.

Innovation Solution

A communication network architecture that dynamically configures a combination of fixed and mobile nodes, utilizing multi-network on-board units (OBUs) and cloud-based data-driven management to ensure robust, scalable, and energy-efficient connectivity, with adaptive protocols for various environments and use cases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current communication networks are used to support moving and static nodes, then network simplicity is maintained, but reliability and scalability of connectivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network is segmented into multiple independent components including OBUs, access points, controllers, and gateways. Each component operates autonomously with defined functions, allowing the system to scale by adding or removing segments without affecting overall reliability. The segmentation enables isolated failure containment and independent optimization of each network element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The network architecture employs dynamic configuration where OBUs can switch between mobile and fixed node roles based on operational needs. The system dynamically adjusts network topology, routing paths, and resource allocation in real-time to maintain connectivity reliability as vehicles move through different geographic areas and network conditions change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the network supports both static and mobile nodes, then versatility is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork adaptabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Different network nodes are assigned specialized functions and capabilities appropriate to their role. Mobile OBUs are equipped with wireless communication and location services, while fixed infrastructure nodes provide stable anchoring and resource management. This local optimization allows each node to consume energy only for its specific functions rather than maintaining all capabilities universally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters dynamically based on node mobility state. When vehicles are stationary, OBUs can enter low-power modes or switch to fixed node operation with reduced energy consumption. The network adjusts transmission power, sampling rates, and communication frequency according to whether nodes are moving or static, optimizing energy efficiency while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If dynamic network configuration is implemented, then connectivity reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resilienceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A cloud-based controller acts as an intermediary that manages the complexity of dynamic network configuration. The controller receives status information from OBUs, makes centralized decisions about network topology and resource allocation, and distributes configuration commands. This intermediary approach maintains network resilience through dynamic adaptation while shielding individual nodes from the complexity of coordination and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where OBUs report their operational status, location, and network conditions to the controller. The controller uses this feedback to dynamically adjust network configuration, routing, and resource allocation. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adaptation to changing conditions without requiring complex manual configuration or intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If cloud-based data-driven management is used, then resource utilization is optimized, but network latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidnetwork latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing data locally at OBUs and access points before transmission to the cloud. Local filtering, aggregation, and preliminary analysis reduce the volume of data requiring cloud processing and enable faster local responses. Critical time-sensitive operations are executed locally without cloud intervention, while non-time-critical analytics are performed in the cloud to optimize overall resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11363673B2Cloud-based data-driven Wi-Fi connectivity management in a network of moving things including, for example, autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 NEXAR LTD
  • US11363673B2 patent drawing
  • US11363673B2 patent drawing
  • US11363673B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for cloud-based data-driven Wi-Fi connectivity management in a network of moving things.