Golf Club Head Miter Joint for Vacuum Brazing Thin Sections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for brazing dissimilar materials in golf club heads, such as titanium and steel, are costly, complex, and impractical for thin cross-sectional regions, leading to stress concentration and limited joint implementation, while traditional joints like tongue-and-groove require precise fitment and add unnecessary weight.

Innovation Solution

A miter joint using nickel-based or copper-based filler materials is employed in a vacuum brazing process to join dissimilar materials, such as titanium and steel, reducing complexity and cost, and allowing for a self-centering, durable joint in highly stressed regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If tongue-and-groove joint is used for brazing face plate to club body, then joint strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase due to precise fitment requirements and tight corners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint strengthVSAvoidjoint complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The joint is divided into a male portion on the face plate and a female portion on the club body, with each portion having simplified geometry that eliminates tight corners while maintaining structural integrity through the brazing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating interlocking geometric features requiring precise fitment, the invention inverts the approach by using a simple male-female configuration where the brazing material itself provides the bonding strength, eliminating the need for complex mechanical interlocking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Strength

If tongue-and-groove joint is used, then joint security is improved, but weight increases due to additional material required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejoint securityVSAvoidjoint weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the unnecessary geometric interlocking features from the joint design, retaining only the essential male-female configuration needed for alignment, while eliminating excess material that would increase weight without contributing to joint strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If larger joint width is used for tongue-and-groove, then brazing success is improved, but heat management challenges increase in thin cross-sectional regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrazing successVSAvoidheat management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The joint design adapts to local cross-sectional dimensions by using a male-female configuration that can be scaled to match the available material thickness at each location, allowing adequate brazing material placement without requiring excessive joint width that would cause heat management issues in thin sections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If tongue-and-groove joint with tight corners is used, then brazing security is improved, but stress concentration increases in highly stressed regions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrazing securityVSAvoidstress concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the traditional approach of creating stress-resistant joints through geometric interlocking, instead using a simplified male-female configuration where the stress distribution is optimized by eliminating tight corners and allowing the brazing material to provide uniform bonding without stress concentration points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The miter joint provides a strong, cost-effective, and lightweight connection between golf club components, minimizing machining complexity and stress concentration, while enabling efficient heat management and improved durability.

Implementation Method 1

A miter joint using nickel-based or copper-based filler materials is employed in a vacuum brazing process to join dissimilar materials, such as titanium and steel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBrazing: Brazing

Implementation Method 2

a vacuum brazing process to join dissimilar materials

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS20250345669A1Golf Club Head With Miter Joint For Brazing
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 TOPGOLF CALLAWAY BRANDS CORP
  • US20250345669A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345669A1 patent drawing
  • US20250345669A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A golf club head with a mitered joint for joining components of dissimilar materials is disclosed herein. The golf club head has a body with an internal edge defining a recess, and a face component having an internal edge. The face component is disposed over the recess. The internal edge of the body and the internal edge of the face have an angle ranging from about 10 degrees to about 80 degrees.