Cluster Formation Control for Stream Relay Path Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network technologies face challenges in maintaining the quality of the stream relay path when adding a participant terminal, especially in scenarios with limited cluster resources, leading to potential deterioration of the stream relay path quality.

Innovation Solution

A communication terminal equipped with a cluster quality calculation section, a cluster sustainability calculation section, and a cluster division/integration analysis section determines optimal cluster formation by assessing packet loss and resource availability to promptly add participant terminals while maintaining stream relay path quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If a large number of communication terminals belong to one cluster, then the time for measuring bandwidth and delay is reduced, but the flexibility for reconstructing the stream relay path is reduced and it becomes difficult to receive a participant terminal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for measuring bandwidth and delayVSAvoidflexibility for reconstructing stream relay path
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cluster into sub-clusters based on terminal count thresholds. When the number of terminals exceeds a first threshold, the cluster is divided into multiple sub-clusters, each with its own cluster head. This segmentation maintains measurement efficiency while restoring path reconstruction flexibility, as each sub-cluster can independently manage participant terminals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a small number of communication terminals belong to one cluster, then the flexibility for reconstructing the stream relay path is improved, but the time for measuring bandwidth and delay increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility for reconstructing stream relay pathVSAvoidtime for measuring bandwidth and delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges clusters into a single cluster when the number of terminals falls below a second threshold. This consolidation reduces the number of separate measurement processes required, thereby reducing the time for measuring bandwidth and delay while maintaining sufficient flexibility through the unified cluster structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If the number of communication terminals in a cluster exceeds a threshold, then the cluster can promptly perform addition of a participant terminal, but the quality of the stream relay path may deteriorate due to limited cluster resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of adding participant terminalVSAvoidquality of stream relay path
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

When the number of terminals exceeds the first threshold, the cluster is segmented into multiple sub-clusters. This allows the system to accept participant terminals promptly across multiple sub-clusters while distributing the resource burden, thereby maintaining stream relay path quality through resource distribution rather than concentration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If clusters are frequently divided and integrated, then the network can adapt to changing terminal numbers, but the complexity of cluster management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to adapt to terminal number changesVSAvoidcomplexity of cluster management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where cluster heads monitor the number of terminals in their cluster and automatically trigger division or integration operations based on predefined thresholds. This automated feedback loop enables the network to adapt to terminal number changes while minimizing manual intervention and reducing overall management complexity through rule-based automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2629461B1Communication terminal and cluster observation method
Publication Date: 2018.04.04 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • EP2629461B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2629461B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2629461B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

It is an object to provide a communication terminal capable of determining a cluster formation so as to promptly perform addition of a participant terminal, while maintaining the quality of a stream relay path. Cluster monitoring terminal (430) is an apparatus to determine a cluster formation in a network performing packet transfer according to terminal relay-type multipoint communication, and includes: a cluster quality calculation section (432) for acquiring cluster quality representing a small loss in a packet to be received, per a cluster; a cluster sustainability calculation section (433) for acquiring cluster sustainability representing ease of acceptance of a participant terminal, per a cluster; and cluster division/integration analysis section (434) for determining cluster division with respect to a cluster having low cluster quality, and determining integration with other cluster with respect to a cluster having high cluster quality and low cluster sustainability.