Cluster-Based Uplink Joint Scheduling for Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional joint scheduling techniques in wireless networks consume substantial network resources and fail to effectively mitigate inter-cluster interference, limiting their ability to optimize throughput and coverage.

Innovation Solution

The method involves performing iterative and sequential joint scheduling within clusters, incorporating an out-of-cluster utility component to maximize sum utility, which includes loosely and tightly coordinated neighboring base stations, and using pico and macro base stations to coordinate scheduling decisions, thereby reducing signaling overhead and computational complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional joint scheduling techniques are used to coordinate scheduling decisions among neighboring base stations, then interference mitigation is improved, but network resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinter-cell interferenceVSAvoidnetwork resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the network into multiple clusters of base stations, where each cluster performs joint scheduling independently. This segmentation reduces the scope of coordination from the entire network to individual clusters, thereby reducing computational complexity and network resource consumption while still providing interference mitigation within each cluster.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring all base stations to participate in joint scheduling, the patent applies joint scheduling partially to clusters of base stations. This partial action approach allows interference mitigation to be achieved in key areas without the full computational burden of network-wide coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Device complexity

If clustering base stations into separate groups is performed to reduce scheduling complexity, then computational requirements are reduced, but inter-cluster interference mitigation is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling complexityVSAvoidinter-cluster interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network into clusters while introducing a mechanism where each cluster considers not only intra-cluster interference but also inter-cluster interference effects. This is achieved by having clusters exchange scheduling information and utility functions, allowing them to make scheduling decisions that account for external interference without requiring full network coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism where clusters exchange scheduling information and utility function estimates with external clusters. This intermediary communication allows each cluster to incorporate inter-cluster interference considerations into their scheduling decisions without direct coordination between all clusters, thus maintaining reduced complexity while addressing inter-cluster interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If exhaustive search approaches are used to compute scheduling agreements, then scheduling optimization is improved, but computation time and network resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling optimizationVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scheduling optimization problem into cluster-level problems rather than network-wide problems. Each cluster performs optimization independently using its own scheduling information and utility functions, which dramatically reduces the computation time and resources required compared to exhaustive search across the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies optimization techniques partially at the cluster level rather than exhaustively at the network level. This partial optimization approach achieves sufficient scheduling improvement within each cluster without the computational burden of exhaustive network-wide search.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9226309B2Method and system for uplink joint scheduling
Publication Date: 2015.12.29 HONOR DEVICE CO LTD
  • US9226309B2 patent drawing
  • US9226309B2 patent drawing
  • US9226309B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment method for performing joint scheduling in a cluster of base stations (BSs) of a wireless network includes receiving coarse scheduling information pertaining to external BSs and performing joint scheduling for the instant cluster of BSs such that a sum utility is maximized. The sum utility includes an out-of-cluster utility component representing interference observed by the external BSs as a result of the joint scheduling. The out-of-cluster utility component is computed in accordance with the coarse scheduling information.