Automated Clustering with Reference-User Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated data classification and clustering in large datasets face challenges such as inefficiencies in determining true asset value, incomplete data leading to faulty analysis, and computational complexity, especially in high-dimensional databases where context is difficult to establish, making it hard to achieve accurate risk-adjusted valuations and clustering.

Innovation Solution

A system that identifies and utilizes 'reference-users' with superior insights to modify data processing, update analytics, and influence clustering, leveraging their intuitive pattern recognition to refine data structures and establish context, thereby improving clustering accuracy and relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated data classification and clustering algorithms are used on large datasets, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to incomplete data and computational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing efficiencyVSAvoidasset valuation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces reference users as intermediaries between automated clustering algorithms and final asset valuations. These users with domain expertise review and adjust cluster assignments, correcting errors that automated systems make due to incomplete data. This intermediary layer preserves the productivity benefits of automation while improving measurement precision through human insight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where reference users provide corrections to automated clustering results. Their adjustments are fed back into the system to refine future clustering operations. This continuous feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from human expertise while maintaining high processing throughput, resolving the contradiction between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If human insights from reference-users are incorporated to improve clustering accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclustering accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the valuation process into distinct components: automated clustering for initial grouping, reference user review for specific clusters, and algorithmic refinement. This segmentation allows human insights to be applied selectively only where needed rather than throughout the entire process, improving accuracy while limiting the increase in system complexity to manageable levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If reference-users are selected and trained to provide superior insights, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to manual review processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by having reference users review only specific clusters that require human judgment rather than manually reviewing all data points. Automated algorithms handle the majority of clustering operations, while human reviewers focus on borderline or high-stakes cases. This approach maintains high reliability for critical valuations while minimizing time loss through selective human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12099485B1Insight and algorithmic clustering for automated synthesis
Publication Date: 2024.09.24 OOL LLC
  • US12099485B1 patent drawing
  • US12099485B1 patent drawing
  • US12099485B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A decision support system and method, which receives user inputs comprising: at least one user criterion, and at least one user input tuning parameter representing user tradeoff preferences for producing an output; and selectively produces an output of tagged data from a clustered database in dependence on the at least one user criterion, the at least one user input tuning parameter, and a distance function; receives at least one reference-user input parameter representing the at least one reference-user's analysis of the tagged data and the corresponding user inputs, to adapt the distance function in accordance with the reference-user inputs as a feedback signal; and clusters the database in dependence on at least the distance function, wherein the reference-user acts to optimize the distance function based on the user inputs and the output, and on at least one reference-user inference.