Clustering System for Automated Credit Card Action Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods in the financial industry face challenges in providing an automated or semi-automated mechanism for determining appropriate actions for credit card transactions, especially when multiple actions are possible, such as investigating fraud or approving loans, due to the complexity of handling numerous transactions and varying customer behaviors.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system that assigns entities to segments based on their characteristics, calculates membership probabilities, and uses action information associated with these segments to determine the most probable actions, allowing for automated decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated or semi-automated mechanisms are implemented to determine actions for transactions, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex decision-making process into distinct components: transaction data collection, characteristic extraction, segment assignment, membership probability calculation, and action determination. Each component handles a specific aspect of the problem, making the overall system more manageable and implementable despite the complexity of the task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces segment assignments with membership probabilities as an intermediary layer between raw transaction characteristics and final action decisions. This intermediary representation simplifies the decision-making process by transforming complex multi-dimensional transaction data into probabilistic segment memberships that can be more easily mapped to specific actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple possible actions are considered for each entity, then adaptability is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction determination flexibilityVSAvoidaction selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses membership probabilities as feedback to guide action selection. By calculating the probability of entity membership in different segments, the system receives quantitative feedback that directly informs which actions are most appropriate, transforming a complex multi-action decision problem into a probabilistic selection process based on measured membership values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the action determination problem by changing the parameter space from direct action selection to membership probability calculation. Instead of directly measuring which action to take, the system measures membership probabilities across multiple segments and derives actions from these probability values, making the measurement process more tractable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8190512B1Computer-implemented clustering systems and methods for action determination
Publication Date: 2012.05.29 SAS INSTITUTE INC
  • US8190512B1 patent drawing
  • US8190512B1 patent drawing
  • US8190512B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented systems and methods for determining one or more actions to be taken with respect to a first entity. A computer-implemented method can be configured to receive data that is related to characteristics of the first entity as well as data that is related to a plurality of segments. Assignments are determined between the first entity and the segments based upon the characteristics of the first entity and the characteristics associated with the segments. A determined assignment includes a membership probability that is indicative of how probable is membership of the first entity with respect to a segment. One or more actions are determined for the first entity based upon the membership probabilities and action information associated with the assigned segments.