CMC Core Inserts for Complex Internal Cooling Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for creating cooling structures in ceramic matrix composite (CMC) components are expensive, limited in flexibility, and unable to form ideal shapes or optimize coolant flow, particularly due to their unique manufacturing methods and material properties.

Innovation Solution

The use of fugitive graphite-PVB core inserts with integrated flow modification elements, which are removed during processing to create internal cavities and support structures within CMCs, allowing for complex cooling circuits and improved heat distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional drilling and machining methods are used to create cooling structures, then cooling channels can be formed, but the manufacturing cost increases and design flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by embedding core inserts into the CMC preform before densification. These core inserts define the cooling channel geometry in advance, allowing complex 3D structures to be formed during the manufacturing process itself rather than requiring subsequent machining operations. This resolves the contradiction by enabling design flexibility through integrated mold insertion while maintaining cost-effectiveness through process consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The core inserts serve as an intermediary tool that temporarily occupies the space where cooling channels will eventually exist. Made of fugitive materials, these inserts enable the formation of complex internal geometries during manufacturing and are subsequently removed, leaving behind precisely defined cooling channels. This intermediary approach resolves the contradiction by enabling complex designs without requiring expensive post-processing machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If complex internal structures are created using traditional methods, then cooling efficiency can be improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the cooling channel formation process with the CMC manufacturing process by embedding core inserts into the preform before densification. This allows complex internal structures to be created as an integrated part of the manufacturing process rather than through separate, complex post-processing steps. The merging resolves the contradiction by enabling high cooling efficiency through complex geometries while reducing manufacturing complexity through process integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by selecting core insert materials with specific properties (fugitive materials that can be selectively removed) and controlling the densification process parameters to achieve selective material removal. This enables the creation of complex internal structures with optimized cooling efficiency while keeping the manufacturing process relatively simple through material property exploitation rather than complex machining operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If cooling channels are created after CMC manufacturing, then structural integrity is maintained, but additional processing steps and costs are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by forming cooling channels during the CMC manufacturing process itself, before the component is fully densified. The core inserts are embedded in the preform and define the channel geometry during densification. This preliminary formation of cooling channels eliminates the need for subsequent drilling or machining operations, thereby maintaining structural integrity through the densification process while significantly improving manufacturing efficiency by consolidating operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The densification process itself serves the dual function of both densifying the CMC material and forming the cooling channels through the presence of embedded core inserts. The process is self-sufficient, requiring no additional post-processing steps to create the cooling structures. This self-service approach resolves the contradiction by maintaining structural integrity through integrated manufacturing while improving productivity through process consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the formation of cost-effective, complex cooling channels with enhanced cooling efficiency and reduced thermal stress, overcoming the limitations of traditional methods by providing greater design flexibility and improved heat exchange.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the preform with the one or more integrated core inserts to a heat treatment to remove polyvinyl butyral of base structures of the one or more integrated core inserts while retaining graphite and the one or more flow modification elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

binder that poses minimal or no chemical interaction with a CVI process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor infiltration: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentEP4647254A1Cores for ceramic matrix composite components
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 RTX CORP
  • EP4647254A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4647254A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2E
  • EP4647254A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The preparation of ceramic matrix composite (CMCs) is disclosed in which a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) preform is made with one or more integrated core inserts (100a, 100b) having a base structure made of a fugitive material comprising graphite and polyvinyl butyral,), and one or more flow modification elements (110a; 100b; 120a; 120b; 120c; 120d) made of a non-fugitive material. The preform with integrated core inserts (100a, 100b) is subjected to a heat treatment to remove the polyvinyl butyral (e.g., by melting or burning) while retaining the graphite and the one or more flow modification elements (110a...120d). Removal of the polyvinyl butyral results in formation of one or more internal cavities, with the one or more flow modification elements (110a...120d) positioned therein, in the preform in which the retained graphite aids in maintaining the shape of the internal cavities. The preform can then be subjected to densification to form a composite and the remaining graphite can be removed from the internal cavities.