Gas Turbine Flowpath Assembly Using Segmented CMC Ducts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) used in gas turbine engines face challenges due to their difficulty in fabrication and mechanical fastening, low tensile ductility, and mismatched thermal expansion coefficients compared to metal alloys, making them hard to substitute directly for metallic components in flowpath structures.

Innovation Solution

A flowpath assembly is designed using an array of ducts with a perimeter wall structure and a support structure, allowing for the assembly of CMCs in configurations such as rings and arrays, which can include annular central members, radial members, and rings to position and maintain ducts, thereby facilitating their use in gas turbine engines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If CMC materials are used to replace metal alloys in flowpath structures, then weight is reduced, but ease of manufacture and mechanical fastening capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The flowpath structure is divided into multiple separate duct components that can be individually manufactured from CMC materials using appropriate fabrication processes, then assembled together using the support structure with fastening elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A support structure acts as an intermediary component between the CMC ducts, providing a framework that facilitates assembly and mechanical fastening of the CMC components without requiring the CMC material itself to be easily fastened

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Weight of moving object

If CMC materials are used to replace metal alloys in flowpath structures, then weight is reduced, but tensile ductility and strain to failure deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidtensile ductility
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The design changes the structural parameters by using a distributed array of individual ducts supported by a support structure, which alters the load distribution and stress patterns to compensate for the lower tensile ductility of CMC materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the flowpath into multiple individual ducts, the structure can better manage and distribute stresses, preventing catastrophic failure and compensating for the lower strain to failure of CMC materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Weight of moving object

If CMC materials are used to replace metal alloys in flowpath structures, then weight is reduced, but thermal expansion compatibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidthermal expansion compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure serves as a thermal expansion intermediary, providing a mechanical framework that can accommodate the different thermal expansion characteristics of CMC ducts while maintaining overall structural integrity across temperature variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Segmenting the structure into individual ducts mounted on a support framework allows each component to expand and contract independently according to its thermal properties, reducing thermal stress and compatibility issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of manufacture

If ducts are assembled into an array configuration with support structure, then CMC materials can be effectively used despite manufacturing challenges, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The support structure performs multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical support for the ducts, enables assembly and disassembly, facilitates fastening of CMC components, and accommodates thermal expansion, thereby managing complexity through multi-functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10443415B2Flowpath assembly for a gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US10443415B2 patent drawing
  • US10443415B2 patent drawing
  • US10443415B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flowpath apparatus for a gas turbine engine includes: a plurality of ducts arranged in an array, each duct including a peripheral wall structure having a closed perimeter that defines a flow channel from an upstream end to a downstream end thereof; and a support structure positioning a the plurality of ducts in an array configuration.