Ceramic Matrix Composite Surface Layer Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for forming surface layers on ceramic matrix composite (CMC) articles often result in increased cracking and longer machining times due to the brittleness and hardness of the surface layers, which can lead to dimensional inaccuracies and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the deposition of a slurry containing ceramic particles, a binder, and a plasticizer on an infiltrated CMC, followed by machining before melt infiltration, which reduces cracking and machining time by increasing the flexibility and hardness of the surface layer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a surface layer is formed on CMC without binder and plasticizer, then the surface layer is hard, but it becomes brittle and cracks during machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardness of surface layerVSAvoidcracking resistance of surface layer
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The surface layer is formulated as a composite material containing ceramic particles (70-90 vol.%), binder (1-10 wt.%), and plasticizer (1-15 wt.%). This composite structure combines the hardness of ceramic particles with the flexibility provided by binder and plasticizer, resolving the contradiction between hardness and crack resistance during machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameters of the surface layer by introducing binder and plasticizer components. This modifies the physical properties of the surface layer, making it less brittle while retaining sufficient hardness for machining operations, thus preventing cracking during the machining process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If machining is performed after melt infiltration, then the CMC article has final dimensional accuracy, but the total machining time and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracy of CMC articleVSAvoidtotal machining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary machining of the surface layer before melt infiltration. Since the surface layer is softer and more machinable at this stage, the majority of material removal can be done efficiently. After infiltration, only minimal finishing operations are needed to achieve final dimensional accuracy, significantly reducing total machining time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If the surface layer is machined when soft, then machining time is reduced, but the surface layer lacks sufficient hardness for proper machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining timeVSAvoidhardness of surface layer
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the binder and plasticizer content to achieve a specific hardness range that is softer than conventional surface layers. This modified hardness parameter allows the surface layer to be machined more easily while still maintaining sufficient structural integrity, enabling reduced machining time without compromising machinability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in CMC articles with fewer cracks and reduced machining time and cost, as the binder enhances adhesion and the plasticizer increases flexibility, allowing for smoother handling and processing.

Implementation Method 1

The binder in the surface layer during drying may further increase adhesion between particles in the surface layer to reduce cracking in the surface layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 2

Presence of the plasticizer in the surface layer during machining may increase a flexibility and reduce a brittleness of the surface layer to reduce chipping and cracking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasticity: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

drying the slurry to form an article having an outer surface layer that includes the solid particles on the infiltrated CMC

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

infiltrating the article with a molten infiltrant to form a composite article

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelt infiltration: Melting

Data Source

PatentEP3670478B1Surface layer on a ceramic matrix composite
Publication Date: 2023.05.24 ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC
  • EP3670478B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3670478B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3670478B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The disclosure describes a method for forming a surface layer of a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) article. The technique includes depositing (46) a slurry (28) on a surface (24) of an infiltrated CMC (13). The slurry (28) includes a carrier material (36), a binder (38), a plasticizer (40), and solid particles (16). The solid particles (16) include a plurality of fine ceramic particles (32) defining a fine particle average size less than about 5 micrometers. The method further includes drying (48) the slurry (28) to form an article (10) having an outer surface layer (17) that includes the solid particles (16) on the infiltrated CMC (13). The method further includes machining (50) at least a portion of the outer surface layer (17) of the article (10). The method further includes infiltrating (52) the article (10) with a molten infiltrant to form a composite article.