CML Corrosion Instruction Using AI State and Type Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current corrosion prediction methods in the oil and gas industry lack accuracy and specificity for individual Condition Monitoring Locations (CMLs), leading to inefficient and unnecessary inspections, and do not consider the optimization of CML inspections for repair or maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using three AI models to predict future corrosion visual state, severity state, and type of CMLs based on input data, including visual and measurement data, to determine an operating instruction for optimizing inspections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional time-based dynamic simulation is used for corrosion prediction, then the inspection process is simplified, but the prediction accuracy is insufficient and far from applicable for simulating corroded surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection efficiencyVSAvoidcorrosion prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical/time-based simulation methods with artificial intelligence models (deep learning and machine learning models) that process visual images and measurement data to predict corrosion states. This substitution enables high-accuracy prediction while maintaining inspection efficiency, as the AI models can rapidly analyze multiple parameters and generate predictions without requiring lengthy physical simulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the corrosion prediction approach by changing from time-based dynamic simulation to a multi-parameter analysis method using AI models. The system considers visual state parameters, severity parameters, and environmental parameters simultaneously, allowing accurate prediction of corrosion development without relying on lengthy time-based simulations. This parameter transformation enables both high accuracy and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If generic corrosion prediction models are used, then the inspection method is simple to implement, but the prediction lacks specificity for individual Condition Monitoring Locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection method simplicityVSAvoidcorrosion prediction specificity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by training separate AI models for each Condition Monitoring Location (CML) using location-specific visual images and measurement data. Each CML receives customized prediction based on its unique characteristics, material properties, and environmental conditions. This approach maintains simplicity in implementation while achieving high specificity, as the system automatically adapts to each location's unique features through data-driven model training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-training AI models with historical visual images and measurement data from each CML before actual corrosion prediction is needed. This preliminary training phase enables the models to learn location-specific corrosion patterns and behaviors, so that when predictions are required, they can be generated quickly with high specificity without requiring complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If frequent inspections are conducted to ensure safety, then safety monitoring is improved, but resource usage becomes inefficient and unnecessary inspections increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by transitioning from fixed-schedule inspections to dynamic, condition-based inspection scheduling. The AI models continuously predict corrosion states and severity, enabling the system to adapt inspection frequencies based on actual corrosion development rates. When corrosion is slow or stable, inspections are spaced out; when acceleration is detected, inspection frequency increases automatically. This dynamic approach maintains high safety monitoring while optimizing resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by using AI model predictions of future corrosion states to inform subsequent inspection scheduling decisions. The system continuously monitors predicted corrosion severity and adjusts inspection timing based on this feedback loop. This enables safety-critical inspections to be prioritized while reducing or eliminating unnecessary inspections, thereby maintaining high reliability while improving inspection efficiency and resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260098615A1Method for determining instruction for a corrosion monitoring location
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 MATRIX JVCO LTD
  • US20260098615A1 patent drawing
  • US20260098615A1 patent drawing
  • US20260098615A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for determining an operating instruction for a corrosion monitoring location (CML) comprises the steps of receiving input data describing a current corrosion state of the CML, predicting, by a first artificial intelligence (AI) model, a future corrosion visual state of the CML using at least a first part of the input data, predicting, by a second AI, model, a future corrosion severity state of the CML using at least a second part of the input data, determining, by a third AI, model, a future corrosion type of the CML based at least on the future corrosion visual state of the CML, and determining an operating instruction for the CML based on the future corrosion visual state of the CML, the future corrosion severity state of the CML and the future corrosion type of the CML.