CMOS ETSOI Triple Well Structure for Independent Back Gate Biasing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current semiconductor fabrication techniques face challenges in simultaneously achieving different back gate doping types and biases for transistors, leading to issues with threshold voltage control, leakage, and process variations, particularly in thin silicon on insulator (SOI) technology.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a triple well back gate structure with dual-depth insulating isolation, featuring shallow intra-well and deep inter-well STI, allows for independent biasing of nFETs and pFETs, reducing leakage and enabling flexible threshold voltage adjustment by using different back gate doping types and biases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single BOX SOI wafer is used with uniform doping, then fabrication is simplified, but different back gate doping types and biases cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidback gate doping type flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single BOX SOI wafer into multiple independently biasable regions by introducing deep isolation regions that extend through the BOX layer. This segmentation allows different back gate doping types and biases to be applied to different transistor regions while maintaining overall fabrication simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating regions with different doping types (n-type and p-type) and different isolation depths within the same wafer. Shallow isolation regions separate adjacent transistors of the same type, while deep isolation regions separate transistors requiring different biases, allowing each region to have optimized properties for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If shallow isolation regions are used only, then adjacent transistor isolation is achieved, but well region separation for different biases is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor isolationVSAvoidindependent well biasing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the isolation concept into the vertical dimension by creating deep isolation regions that penetrate through the BOX layer, whereas conventional shallow isolation only extends partway into the BOX. This additional depth dimension enables independent well biasing while maintaining the shallow isolation benefit for adjacent transistor separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the isolation structure into two distinct types: shallow isolation regions for adjacent transistor separation and deep isolation regions for well region separation. This segmentation allows each isolation type to perform its specific function independently, achieving both transistor isolation and independent well biasing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If deep isolation regions extend through BOX layer, then well region separation is achieved, but fabrication complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent well biasingVSAvoidisolation structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies deep isolation regions only where needed to separate well regions requiring different biases, rather than applying deep isolation uniformly across the entire wafer. This localized application reduces overall fabrication complexity while maintaining the necessary well separation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the isolation strategy by using shallow isolation as the default for most adjacent transistor pairs, and selectively applying deep isolation only where well separation is required. This segmentation reduces the total number of deep isolation regions needed, thereby reducing fabrication complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8552500B2Structure for CMOS ETSOI with multiple threshold voltages and active well bias capability
Publication Date: 2013.10.08 GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC
  • US8552500B2 patent drawing
  • US8552500B2 patent drawing
  • US8552500B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A semiconductor substrate having a first type of conductivity and a top surface, a layer of oxide disposed over the top surface and a semiconductor layer disposed over the layer of oxide. A plurality of transistor devices are disposed upon the semiconductor layer. Each transistor device includes a channel between a source and a drain, where some transistor devices have a first type of channel conductivity and the remaining transistor devices have a second type of channel conductivity. A well region is formed adjacent to the top surface. The well region has a second type of conductivity. First trench isolation regions are between adjacent transistor devices that extend through the semiconductor layer. Second trench isolation regions are between adjacent transistor devices of opposite channel conductivity.