CMOS-Compatible Qubit Processing Unit for Scalable Quantum Computing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computing technologies face challenges in scaling and reproducibility, particularly in achieving fault-tolerant quantum computers due to high qubit overhead and noise, necessitating advancements in qubit manufacturing and integration with classical electronics.

Innovation Solution

A qubit processing unit utilizing CMOS-compatible silicon nanowires with split gates and gate dielectrics, enabling scalable two-dimensional arrays of qubits with controllable interactions and efficient error correction, integrated with classical electronics for data management and feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If quantum error correction is implemented using surface code with physical qubits distributed in two-dimensional arrays, then fault-tolerant quantum computing is enabled, but the number of physical qubits required exceeds one million

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault-tolerant quantum computingVSAvoidnumber of physical qubits
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the quantum processing system into modular units, each containing a defined number of qubits (e.g., 4-qubit or 6-qubit units) that can be independently manufactured and then combined. This segmentation allows the system to scale from small modular units to large-scale quantum computers without requiring all qubits to be manufactured simultaneously in a single complex structure, thereby reducing the immediate qubit overhead requirement while maintaining fault tolerance through modular error correction protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional two-dimensional array arrangements of qubits to a three-dimensional modular architecture where quantum processing units are stacked and interconnected vertically and horizontally. This dimensional change allows for more efficient qubit packing and reduces the total number of physical qubits needed by utilizing vertical integration and reducing the overhead associated with two-dimensional surface code implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If qubits are manufactured in academic cleanrooms with low reproducibility, then initial quantum computing results are achieved, but scaling and reproducibility remain challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantum computing resultsVSAvoidscaling and reproducibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs quantum processing units with standardized interfaces and universal manufacturing protocols that can be produced using existing CMOS semiconductor fabrication processes. This universality allows the same manufacturing infrastructure to produce both classical and quantum components with high reproducibility, enabling scaling from laboratory demonstrations to industrial-grade quantum computers without requiring specialized academic cleanroom facilities for each production run.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs precise control of manufacturing parameters including isotopic purification of silicon to achieve specific nuclear spin environments, controlled doping concentrations, and standardized gate oxide thicknesses. These parameter changes ensure that quantum processing units manufactured in different facilities produce qubits with consistent coherence times and operational characteristics, thereby improving reproducibility and enabling large-scale manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If silicon CMOS technology is used for quantum computing, then integration with classical electronics is enabled, but qubit coherence times and fidelities must be maintained at millikelvin temperatures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration with classical electronicsVSAvoidqubit operating temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent separates the quantum processing units from the classical control electronics into distinct temperature zones. The quantum processing units operate at millikelvin temperatures in the quantum processing chamber, while classical electronics operate at higher temperatures in separate control chambers. This segmentation allows each subsystem to operate at its optimal temperature without compromising the other, enabling monolithic integration while maintaining qubit coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces cryogenic intermediate stages and thermal isolation structures that mediate between the millikelvin quantum processing environment and the warmer classical control electronics. These intermediary components include cryogenic amplifiers, thermal barriers, and controlled interconnect structures that allow electrical signals to pass between temperature zones while maintaining thermal isolation, thereby enabling integration without temperature compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables scalable and reproducible quantum computing with improved coherence times and fidelity, facilitating universal quantum computing through modular architectures and efficient error correction, suitable for large-scale quantum algorithms and complex system simulations.

Implementation Method 1

the spins of charged particles at millikelvin temperatures and finite magnetic fields of which simplest example is the spin 1⁄2 of a single charge electrostatically confined in a quantum dot at the interface of a MOS nanodevice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic confinement: Electrostatics

Implementation Method 2

a junction adapted for controllably coupling respective ends of the first and second modules to allow charge and/or spin to be extracted from the end of one of the first and second modules and to be moved so as to be presented to the end of the other of the first and second modules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCharge transport: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentEP3975072B1Qubit processing
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 HITACHI LTD
  • EP3975072B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3975072B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3975072B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A qubit processing unit is disclosed. The qubit processing unit comprises a first module (401) for defining a first linear array of N1 qubits, a second module (402) for defining a second linear array of N2 qubits and a junction (50) for controllably coupling respective ends of the first and second modules to allow charge and/or spin to be extracted from the end of one of the first and second modules and to be moved so as to be presented to the end of the other of the first and second modules. The junction comprises a two-dimensional silicon channel and at least three gate stacks (821, 82C, 822) disposed on the silicon channel (86; Fig. 6) so as to provide a series of nodes in a path between the ends of the first and second modules, each stack comprising a gate (82; Fig. 6) and a gate dielectric (77; Fig. 6) interposed between the silicon channel and the gate. The gate dielectric comprises a CMOS-compatible material and the gate comprising CMOS-compatible material(s).