CMOS X-ray Detector Bright Pixel Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dental x-ray systems using film expose patients to high x-ray doses, are costly, and pose disposal challenges, while solid-state sensors reduce dosage but increase thickness and degrade image resolution due to scattering issues.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a controller that measures charge over time to identify and correct x-ray hits in pixel sensors, using distributed ADCs and adaptive thresholding to combine data from multiple frames, reducing the need for thick shielding and improving image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a shielding layer is added to block x-rays and reduce bright pixels, then the number of bright pixels is reduced to an acceptable level, but the thickness of the sensor increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebright pixelsVSAvoidsensor thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the shielding layer entirely from the sensor structure. Instead of physically blocking x-rays with a thick shielding plate, the system extracts and eliminates the harmful bright pixels through digital image processing algorithms that identify and correct x-ray hit events in the captured images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical shielding approach (using a thick plate to block x-rays) with a computational/software-based solution. The system uses image processing algorithms to detect and correct x-ray hits digitally, substituting physical blocking with electronic/c computational methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the sensor thickness is reduced to improve patient comfort, then the sensor becomes more patient-friendly, but the ability to shield x-rays and reduce bright pixels is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient comfortVSAvoidbright pixels
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the shielding layer from the sensor design, allowing for a thinner sensor that improves patient comfort. The harmful bright pixels are then extracted and corrected through digital image processing rather than physical blocking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical shielding function with a computational correction system. The thin sensor allows patient comfort while the software-based bright pixel correction maintains image quality without requiring thick physical shielding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If conventional film is used for x-ray detection, then the system is simple and well-established, but the patient is exposed to high x-ray doses and film processing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidx-ray dosage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the detection parameter from film-based optical detection to solid-state photodetector-based electronic detection. This parameter change enables digital imaging with lower x-ray doses while maintaining system simplicity through the use of standard CMOS technology and digital image processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the thickness of the sensor, enhances image resolution, and minimizes bright pixels, providing a more patient-friendly and cost-effective digital dental imaging solution.

Implementation Method 1

a layer of scintillation material is used to convert the x-rays to visible light

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScintillation: Scintillation

Implementation Method 2

each of said pixel sensors comprises a photodetector that stores a charge in response to said light being received by that photodetector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

The optical fibers are doped with a heavy metal that absorbs x-rays that are not converted in the scintillation material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP2135492B8Compact CMOS-based x-ray detector adapted for dental applications
Publication Date: 2015.07.01 BAE SYSTEMS IMAGING SOLUTIONS INC

AI summary

An image sensor having a two-dimensional array of pixel sensors [201], a layer of scintillation material[206], and a controller[202] is disclosed. The layer of scintillation material is adjacent to the two-dimensional array, the scintillation material emits light in response to x-rays impinging thereon. The pixel sensors detect this light. The controller reads out data stored in the two-dimensional array of pixel sensors and forms an image therefrom. The controller corrects the data for errors resulting from x-rays that generate electrons that are stored in the pixel sensors [41] in the process of forming the image. In one aspect of the invention, the controller forms the image by causing the two-dimensional array to form a plurality of frames, each frame includes a measurement of a charge stored on each photodiode[46] during a preceding time period. The controller selectively combines data from the frames to form the image.