CMOS X-ray Sensor Noise Reduction via Non-destructive Sampling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CMOS Active Pixel Sensors in X-ray diffraction systems face high readout noise due to thermal, 1/f noise, and dark current shot noise, which existing noise reduction techniques cannot effectively address without increasing readout dead time or failing to account for non-linear sensor responses and dynamic illumination sources.

Innovation Solution

A five-step process to reduce readout noise in CMOS Active Pixel Sensors, involving correction for gain variation and nonlinearity, estimation and subtraction of fixed pattern and dark current noise, and fitting a model function to pixel charge data using non-destructive measurements, allowing for optimal estimation of X-ray fluence while minimizing noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple non-destructive reads are performed to reduce readout noise, then readout noise is reduced by a factor of sqrt(N), but readout dead time is increased by a factor of N

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadout noiseVSAvoidreadout dead time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs multiple non-destructive reads during the integration period before the final destructive read. By taking preliminary measurements of the charge at different times during integration, the system can reduce readout noise through statistical averaging while maintaining the same total readout time as a single read operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically samples the charge at multiple time points during the integration period rather than performing a single static read. This dynamic sampling approach allows the system to capture charge information throughout the integration window, enabling noise reduction without extending the overall measurement time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If conventional noise reduction techniques are applied to CMOS sensors, then readout noise is reduced, but they fail to account for non-linear sensor responses and dynamic illumination sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadout noiseVSAvoidaccuracy under dynamic conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the sampling parameters by taking multiple reads at different time points during integration. This allows the system to adapt to dynamic illumination conditions and non-linear sensor responses by capturing the charge evolution over time, thereby maintaining accuracy while reducing noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses the multiple non-destructive read measurements as feedback to model and correct for non-linear sensor behavior and dynamic illumination. By analyzing the charge values at different time points, the system can infer and compensate for non-ideal sensor characteristics, improving measurement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If CMOS Active Pixel Sensors are used instead of CCD detectors, then high speed readout, high quantum gain and large active areas are achieved, but readout noise is an order of magnitude larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadout speedVSAvoidreadout noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs more read operations than the minimum single read required. By executing multiple non-destructive reads during integration followed by one destructive read, the system exceeds the basic requirement and achieves noise reduction while preserving the high readout speed advantage of CMOS sensors over CCD detectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces readout noise in CMOS sensors while preserving speed and dynamic range, effectively addressing the limitations of prior art by accounting for non-linear sensor responses and dynamic illumination in X-ray diffraction systems.

Implementation Method 1

Each pixel of the sensor comprises a photodetector and an associated capacitor. The capacitor accumulates charge from incident X-rays during an integration time.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2773949B1Multiply-sampled CMOS sensor for x-ray diffraction measurements with corrections for non-ideal sensor behavior
Publication Date: 2017.12.06 BRUKER AXS INC
  • EP2773949B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2773949B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4B
  • EP2773949B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

Readout noise for each pixel in a CMOS Active Pixel Sensor is reduced by a five step process in which the pixel charge data from the sensor is nondestructively sampled at a plurality of times during a sensor frame time period and corrected for gain variation and nonlinearity. Then fixed pattern 5 and dark current noise is estimated and subtracted from the corrected pixel charge data. Next, reset noise is estimated and subtracted from the pixel charge data. In step four, a model function of charge versus time is fit to the corrected pixel charge data samples. Finally, the fitted model function is evaluated at frame boundary times.