CMP Polishing Body Pore Structure for Grain Retention and Low Drag

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing abrasive bodies for CMP methods face issues with stable polishing performance and uniformity due to excessive abrasive grain release and high sliding resistance, which can lead to vibration and scratches on large workpieces.

Innovation Solution

An abrasive body with a resin structure and longitudinal pores, where the average diameter of communicating pores is not more than 18 times larger than the abrasive grains, and the presence of longitudinal pores with openings on the polishing surface, reduces sliding resistance and retains abrasive grains effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the diameter of the pores is sufficiently reduced to retain abrasive grains stably, then abrasive grain retention is improved, but negative pressure increases and sliding resistance becomes larger

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasive grain retentionVSAvoidsliding resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the pore structure into two distinct types: communicating pores (for abrasive grain retention) and longitudinal pores (for pressure relief). This segmentation allows each pore type to fulfill its specific function without compromising the other, resolving the contradiction between grain retention and sliding resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes a dual-pore porous structure where communicating pores with controlled diameters retain abrasive grains while longitudinal pores provide pressure relief pathways. This porous material design enables simultaneous achievement of grain stability and reduced sliding resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Ease of operation

If large pores are formed to reduce sliding resistance, then polishing uniformity is improved, but abrasive grains may not be retained stably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding resistanceVSAvoidabrasive grain retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the pore system into communicating pores (small diameter for grain retention) and longitudinal pores (large diameter for pressure relief). This segmentation allows large pores to reduce sliding resistance while small communicating pores ensure stable abrasive grain containment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces longitudinal pores that extend in the thickness direction, adding a vertical dimension to the pore structure. This dimensional change allows pressure relief without compromising the horizontal grain retention function of communicating pores.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If a high amount of water-soluble particles is used to form large pores, then sliding resistance is reduced, but scratches on the workpiece increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesliding resistanceVSAvoidworkpiece scratches
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a controlled porous structure formed by water-soluble particles as pore formers, but precisely controls their amount and distribution. The resulting longitudinal pores provide pressure relief while the structured porosity prevents excessive particle release that would cause scratches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the parameters of pore formation by controlling the amount, size distribution, and spatial arrangement of water-soluble particles. This parameter optimization ensures sufficient longitudinal pores for pressure relief while maintaining abrasive grain retention and preventing workpiece scratches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves stable polishing performance and uniformity by reducing abrasive grain release and sliding resistance, preventing scratches on workpieces, and enabling smooth polishing of large areas without the need for costly slurry.

Implementation Method 1

the resin structure includes communicating pores each of which communicating with the longitudinal pore and/or communicating with other communicating pore, wherein the communicating pores include at least one of the abrasive grains in the pores respectively

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

the presence of longitudinal pores formed to extend in a thickness direction in the abrasive body... the average diameter of the communicating pores is not more than 18 times larger than the average diameter of the abrasive grains

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction through porous structure: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS11745303B2Polishing body and manufacturing method therefor
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 NORITAKE CO LTD
  • US11745303B2 patent drawing
  • US11745303B2 patent drawing
  • US11745303B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an abrasive body used for polishing by a CMP method, provided with a resin structure, a plurality of abrasive grains, and a plurality of longitudinal pores, and made in a form of disc, the longitudinal pore has a length in a thickness direction of the abrasive body longer than a length in a planar direction of the abrasive body, the resin structure includes communicating pores each of which communicating with the longitudinal pore and/or communicating with other communicating pore, the communicating pores include at least one of the abrasive grains in the pores respectively, and the average diameter of the communicating pores is not more than 18 times larger than the average diameter of the abrasive grains.