CMP Polishing Head Zone Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) processes face challenges in determining the completion of planarization, leading to variations in material removal rates and non-uniformity across semiconductor substrates due to factors like slurry distribution, polishing pad conditions, and load variations, which result in inconsistent dishing and erosion.

Innovation Solution

Implementing an in-situ monitoring system to detect clearance times across different substrate zones, adjusting polishing pressures based on calculated ratios to achieve uniform clearance times, and using independently adjustable pressure chambers to control polishing pressures across concentric zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If polishing pressure is increased to improve material removal rate, then productivity increases, but dishing and erosion non-uniformity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoiddishing and erosion uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The polishing head is divided into multiple independently controllable pressure zones (e.g., inner, middle, outer zones) that can be adjusted separately. This segmentation allows different regions of the substrate to receive optimized pressure levels, enabling high material removal rates in certain zones while maintaining uniformity across the entire substrate surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different pressure levels are applied to different zones of the substrate based on their specific polishing requirements. The system applies local quality control by tailoring the polishing pressure to each zone's needs, thereby achieving both high productivity and uniform manufacturing precision across the entire substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If polishing time is extended to achieve desired flatness, then manufacturing precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubstrate flatnessVSAvoidpolishing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

An in-situ monitoring system continuously measures substrate topography during polishing and provides real-time feedback to the control system. This feedback mechanism allows the system to detect when the desired flatness is achieved and automatically adjust or terminate the polishing process, thereby achieving high manufacturing precision while minimizing polishing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary measurements and calculations to determine the optimal polishing parameters and expected duration before actual polishing begins. By pre-planning the polishing process based on initial substrate conditions, the system can achieve desired flatness more quickly without excessive time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If in-situ monitoring is implemented to detect clearance time, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearance time detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical measurement systems with optical or electromagnetic sensing methods for in-situ monitoring. This substitution reduces mechanical complexity while maintaining or improving measurement accuracy for detecting clearance time and substrate topography during polishing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is integrated directly into the polishing apparatus, allowing the system to self-monitor and self-adjust without requiring external complex measurement equipment. The polishing head incorporates sensors that automatically detect clearance conditions and provide feedback for real-time pressure adjustment, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances uniformity in dishing and erosion across the substrate, reduces within-wafer non-uniformity, and allows for consistent process control between different materials, improving the accuracy and efficiency of the polishing process.

Implementation Method 1

Optical monitoring can usually detect clearance of the overlying layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical monitoring: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS9472475B2Feedback control using detection of clearance and adjustment for uniform topography
Publication Date: 2016.10.18 APPLIED MATERIALS INC
  • US9472475B2 patent drawing
  • US9472475B2 patent drawing
  • US9472475B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling polishing includes storing a desired ratio representing a ratio for a clearance time of a first zone of a substrate to a clearance time of a second zone of the substrate. During polishing of a first substrate, an overlying layer is monitored, a sequence of measurements is generated, and the measurements are sorted a first group associated with the first zone of the substrate and a second group associated with the second zone on the substrate. A first time and a second time at which the overlying layer is cleared is determined based on the measurements from the first group and the second group, respectively. At least one adjusted polishing pressure is calculated for the first zone based on a first pressure applied in the first zone during polishing the first substrate, the first time, the second time, and the desired ratio.