CNC Machine Access Control for Multi-User Command Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing CNC machines lack effective mechanisms to manage multiple user access and permissions, leading to potential accidents, theft, and simultaneous command issues, especially in complex systems like laser cutters/engravers.

Innovation Solution

Implement a computer-numerically-controlled machine with selective command execution based on hardware state and user/machine identification, using a set of rules to manage user permissions and prevent unauthorized access or simultaneous commands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a CNC machine is configured to be used by multiple users with various accounts and permission levels, then the machine can serve more users and increase productivity, but the risk of accidents, theft, and simultaneous command issues increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-user access capabilityVSAvoidaccidents and theft risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments user access into distinct permission levels (administrator, operator, observer) with specific rights and restrictions. Each user account is assigned a particular role that defines what commands they can issue, what hardware states they can access, and what operations they can perform, thereby enabling multi-user productivity while preventing unauthorized actions that could lead to accidents or theft

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary between users and the CNC machine hardware. It mediates all commands by verifying user identity, checking permission levels, validating hardware states, and enforcing rules before executing or rejecting commands. This intermediary layer prevents direct unauthorized access while maintaining efficient multi-user operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the CNC machine allows simultaneous commands from multiple users, then user convenience and operational efficiency improve, but command conflicts and safety issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrent user accessVSAvoidcommand execution safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts command acceptance based on real-time hardware states and user permissions. The control system continuously monitors machine state and modifies its behavior accordingly - allowing certain commands from specific users when hardware conditions are appropriate, while blocking commands when they would create conflicts or safety issues. This dynamic approach enables concurrent access while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the control system continuously monitors hardware states, user actions, and command queues. Based on this feedback, it dynamically determines which commands to execute, delay, or reject, ensuring that simultaneous commands from multiple users do not create conflicts. The system provides real-time status information to users about command acceptance and machine state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the CNC machine implements comprehensive permission verification and hardware state checking, then safety and access control improve, but system complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control securityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining user roles, permission levels, and allowed commands during system setup. User accounts are pre-configured with specific permissions, and the control system maintains pre-established rules about which users can execute which commands under which hardware conditions. This preliminary configuration reduces runtime complexity while maintaining comprehensive security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by parameterizing user permissions and hardware state requirements. Instead of hard-coded complex logic, the system uses configurable parameters that define user roles, command permissions, and hardware state thresholds. These parameters can be adjusted without changing the underlying control logic, allowing flexible access control with manageable system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances user access control, preventing accidents and theft while ensuring safe and controlled operation in multi-user environments.

Implementation Method 1

a laser configured to deliver electromagnetic energy to effect a change in a material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

deliver electromagnetic energy to effect a change in a material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic energy: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS20250334949A1Multi-User Computer-Numerically-Controlled Machine
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 MAKEBLOCK HONGKONG HOLDING LTD
  • US20250334949A1 patent drawing
  • US20250334949A1 patent drawing
  • US20250334949A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for accessing a computer-numerically-controlled machine can include receiving a command to be executed by the computer-numerically-controlled machine. A hardware state of a component in the computer-numerically-controlled machine can be determined by receiving, from the component, data indicative of the hardware state. An origin of the command including a user identification of a user who sent the command and/or a machine identification of a device that sent the command can be determined. Whether the computer-numerically-controlled machine is allowed to execute the command can be determined by applying a set of rules and based on the hardware state and/or the origin of the command. In response to determining that the computer-numerically-controlled machine is allowed to execute the command, the command can be executed at the computer-numerically-controlled machine.