CNC Tool Path Generation for Limiting-Surface Step-Up Milling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated tool path generation methods for computer numerically controlled (CNC) milling machines do not effectively minimize material removal while ensuring that machined surfaces lie between defined inner and outer limiting surfaces, and they lack optimization based on spindle power and tool overhang.

Innovation Solution

An automated method for generating CNC tool paths that calculates multiple step-up cuts along the Z-axis, determining cut locations and widths based on the required slope of the finished object, and adjusts parameters like spindle power and tool overhang to minimize material removal and optimize machining efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional automated tool path generation methods are used, then machining operations can be performed, but material removal is not minimized and machined surfaces may not lie between defined limiting surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface location precisionVSAvoidmaterial removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary calculations to determine the precise tool path that will produce surfaces between limiting surfaces. By pre-calculating the optimal cut locations and depths based on the desired surface geometry and tool diameter, the system ensures that material is removed only where necessary, minimizing waste while achieving precise surface locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The tool path generation dynamically adjusts cut parameters including variable cut depths, step-over distances, and tool paths based on the local geometry and required surface locations. This dynamic optimization ensures that each cut removes the minimum necessary material while maintaining surfaces within the defined limiting boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If aggressive material removal is used to increase productivity, then machining speed improves, but machining accuracy and surface quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining speedVSAvoidsurface accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The machining process is segmented into multiple controlled passes with calculated step-up cuts. Each pass removes a portion of material with precision control, and the cumulative effect of these segmented operations achieves both high productivity and surface accuracy. The tool path is divided into discrete cut segments that can be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method dynamically changes machining parameters including cut depth, feed rate, and tool path spacing based on the required surface accuracy and material removal rate. By adjusting these parameters throughout the machining process, the system maintains optimal balance between productivity and precision for different regions of the workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If tool paths are calculated without considering spindle power and tool overhang, then generation is simpler, but machining efficiency and stability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool path calculation complexityVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The tool path generation incorporates feedback from machine parameters including spindle power capacity and tool overhang constraints. The system uses these parameters to optimize cut depths, feed rates, and tool paths, ensuring that each operation remains within the machine's capabilities while maximizing efficiency. This feedback-driven approach automatically adapts the tool path to the specific machine configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Manufacturing precision

If excessive material is removed to ensure surfaces meet specifications, then surface quality is guaranteed, but material waste increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidmaterial utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of the exact tool path required to produce surfaces that meet specifications. By pre-determining the optimal cut parameters and tool paths based on the desired surface geometry and tool characteristics, the system ensures that material is removed only to the extent necessary, guaranteeing surface quality while maximizing material utilization and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11625019B2Computerized tool path generation
Publication Date: 2023.04.11 SOLIDCAM
  • US11625019B2 patent drawing
  • US11625019B2 patent drawing
  • US11625019B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated computer-implemented method for generating commands for controlling a computer numerically controlled milling machine to fabricate a machined object from a workpiece, the machined object being configured to facilitate subsequent finishing into a finished object, the method including defining a surface of the finished object, defining an offset surface defining an inner limiting surface of the machined object, defining a scallop surface defining an outer limiting surface of the machined object and calculating a tool path for the milling machine which produces multiple step-up cuts in the workpiece resulting in the machined object, wherein surfaces of the machined object all lie between the inner limiting surface and the outer limiting surface and the number of step-up cuts in the workpiece and the areas cut in each of the step-up cuts are selected to generally minimize the amount of workpiece material that is removed from the workpiece.